(Mark
One)
|
||
ý
|
ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
|
For
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006
|
||
OR
|
||
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
|
For
the transition period
from to
|
||
Commission
file number 0-32501
|
DELAWARE
|
33-0827593
|
|
(State
or Other Jurisdiction
of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
Identification
No.)
|
|
3020
CALLAN ROAD, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA
|
92121
|
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
PART
I
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
PART
II
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
PART
III
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
PART
IV
|
||
|
Therapeutic
Application
|
Discovery
|
Preclinical
|
Clinical
Testing
|
Notes
|
|||||
Reconstructive
Surgery
|
|||||||||
Breast
reconstruction
|
X
|
Efficacy
study expected to start in 2007
|
|||||||
Cardiovascular
Disease
|
|||||||||
Chronic
Myocardial Ischemia
|
X
|
Safety
and feasibility trial underway
|
|||||||
Heart
Attack
|
X
|
Safety
and feasibility trial expected to start Q2 2007
|
|||||||
Gastrointestinal
Disorders
|
|||||||||
Crohn’s
Disease
|
X
|
||||||||
Intestinal
Repair
|
X
|
||||||||
Vascular
Repair
|
|||||||||
Peripheral
Vascular Disease
|
X
|
||||||||
Orthopedics
|
|||||||||
Spinal
Disc Disease
|
X
|
||||||||
Bone
Repair
|
X
|
· |
Design
and implementation for two cardiovascular disease clinical trials
in Spain
and The Netherlands for chronic myocardial ischemia and heart attacks,
respectively;
|
· |
Collaboration
with clinical investigators using the Celution™ System in breast
reconstruction applications in Japan;
|
· |
Conducting
extensive pre-clinical studies investigating the use of adipose-derived
stem and regenerative cells for cardiovascular disease, plastic and
reconstructive surgery, spinal disc repair, and gastrointestinal
disorders;
|
· |
Preparation
and submission of multiple regulatory filings in the United States
and
Europe related to various cell processing systems under development;
|
· |
Optimization
of the design, functionality and manufacturing process for the Celution™
System; and
|
· |
Investigating
the cellular and molecular properties and characteristics of stem
and
regenerative cells residing in adipose tissue towards improving our
intellectual property position and towards understanding how to improve
and control the therapeutic products;
|
Product
Line
|
Cleared
Indications
|
Clearance
Date
|
||
Celution™
System
|
Collection,
concentration, washing, and reinfusion of atutologous cells collected
intraoperatively or postoperatively to obtain concentrated blood
cells for
reinfusion in various surgical procedures to include General
Surgery,
Plastics and Reconstructive Surgery, and Cardiovascular
Surgery.
|
28
September 2006
|
Product
Line
|
Cleared
Indications
|
Clearance
Date
|
||
Celution™
System
|
To
extract, wash, and concentrate stromal stem cells and other associated
progenitor cells from digested adipose tissues for autologous
re-implantation or re-infusion into the same patient.
|
24
January 2006
|
||
Ceparator
Device
|
To
collect, digest and liquefy adipose tissue to release stem cells
for
further processing
|
24
January 2006
|
||
Celase
Enzyme
|
To
digest and liquefy adipose tissue to release stem cells for further
processing
|
24
January 2006
|
Regenerative
Cell Technology
|
MacroPore
Biosurgery
|
Corporate
|
Total
|
||||||||||
Manufacturing
|
—
|
4
|
—
|
4
|
|||||||||
Research
& Development
|
88
|
1
|
—
|
89
|
|||||||||
Sales
and Marketing
|
5
|
—
|
—
|
5
|
|||||||||
General
& Administrative
|
—
|
—
|
35
|
35
|
|||||||||
Total
|
93
|
5
|
35
|
133
|
· |
16,000
additional square feet for research and development activities
located at
6749 Top Gun Street, San Diego, California that has been amended
to
terminate on April 30, 2007.
|
· |
4,027
square feet of office space located at 9-3 Otsuka 2-chome, Bunkyo-ku,
Tokyo, Japan. The agreement bears rent at a rate of $3.66 per square
foot,
expiring on November 30, 2007.
|
High Euro
|
High U.S.
|
Low Euro
|
Low U.S.
|
||||||||||
2004
|
|||||||||||||
Quarter
ended March 31, 2004
|
€3.45
|
$
|
4.30
|
€2.00
|
$
|
2.58
|
|||||||
Quarter
ended June 30, 2004
|
€3.80
|
$
|
4.61
|
€3.02
|
$
|
3.67
|
|||||||
Quarter
ended September 30, 2004
|
€3.60
|
$
|
4.40
|
€1.93
|
$
|
2.38
|
|||||||
Quarter
ended December 31, 2004
|
€2.73
|
$
|
3.37
|
€1.77
|
$
|
2.43
|
|||||||
2005
|
|||||||||||||
Quarter
ended March 31, 2005
|
€2.13
|
$
|
2.78
|
€2.00
|
$
|
2.61
|
|||||||
Quarter
ended June 30, 2005
|
€2.55
|
$
|
3.08
|
€2.50
|
$
|
3.02
|
|||||||
Quarter
ended September 30, 2005
|
€4.49
|
$
|
5.41
|
€4.21
|
$
|
5.07
|
|||||||
Quarter
ended December 31, 2005
|
€6.85
|
$
|
8.13
|
€6.47
|
$
|
7.68
|
High
U.S.
|
Low
U.S.
|
||||||
2005
|
|||||||
Quarter
ended December 31, 2005
|
$
|
10.01
|
$
|
7.60
|
|||
2006
|
|||||||
Quarter
ended March 31, 2006
|
$
|
9.20
|
$
|
6.65
|
|||
Quarter
ended June 30, 2006
|
$
|
9.16
|
$
|
6.66
|
|||
Quarter
ended September 30, 2006
|
$
|
8.00
|
$
|
4.05
|
|||
Quarter
ended December 31, 2006
|
$
|
7.43
|
$
|
3.87
|
Plan Category
|
Number of securities to be issued
upon exercise of outstanding
options, warrants and rights
|
Weighted-average exercise price
of outstanding options, warrants
and rights
|
Number
of securities remaining
available
for future
issuance under equity compensation
plans (excluding securities reflected
in column(a))
|
|||||||
(a)
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
||||||||
Equity
compensation plans approved by security holders
|
4,409,286
|
$
|
4.22
|
430,653
|
||||||
Equity
compensation plans not approved by security holders(1)
|
1,524,743
|
$
|
5.80
|
2,413,691
|
||||||
Total
|
5,934,029
|
$
|
4.62
|
2,844,344
|
(1)
|
The
maximum number of shares shall be cumulatively increased on the
first
January 1 after the Effective Date, August 24, 2004, and each January
1
thereafter for 9 more years, by a number of shares equal to the
lesser of
(a) 2% of the number of shares issued and outstanding on the immediately
preceding December 31, and (b) a number of shares set by the
Board.
|
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
2002
|
||||||||||||
Statements
of Operations Data:
|
||||||||||||||||
Product
revenues:
|
||||||||||||||||
Sales
to related party
|
$
|
1,451
|
$
|
5,634
|
$
|
4,085
|
$
|
12,893
|
$
|
8,605
|
||||||
Sales
to third parties
|
—
|
—
|
2,237
|
1,186
|
561
|
|||||||||||
1,451
|
5,634
|
6,322
|
14,079
|
9,166
|
||||||||||||
Cost
of product revenues
|
1,634
|
3,154
|
3,384
|
4,244
|
4,564
|
|||||||||||
Gross
profit (loss)
|
(183
|
)
|
2,480
|
2,938
|
9,835
|
4,602
|
||||||||||
Development
revenues:
|
||||||||||||||||
Development
|
6,057
|
51
|
158
|
9
|
—
|
|||||||||||
Research
grants and other
|
419
|
320
|
338
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||||
6,476
|
371
|
496
|
9
|
—
|
||||||||||||
Operating
expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||
Research
and development
|
21,977
|
15,450
|
10,384
|
8,772
|
5,816
|
|||||||||||
Sales
and marketing
|
2,055
|
1,547
|
2,413
|
4,487
|
4,121
|
|||||||||||
General
and administrative
|
12,547
|
10,208
|
6,551
|
5,795
|
4,894
|
|||||||||||
Change
in fair value of option liabilities
|
(4,431
|
)
|
3,645
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||||
Restructuring
charge
|
—
|
—
|
107
|
451
|
—
|
|||||||||||
Equipment
impairment charge
|
—
|
—
|
42
|
—
|
370
|
|||||||||||
In-process
research and development
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
2,296
|
|||||||||||
Total
operating expenses
|
32,148
|
30,850
|
19,497
|
19,505
|
17,497
|
|||||||||||
Other
income (expense):
|
||||||||||||||||
Gain
on sale of assets
|
—
|
5,526
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||||
Gain
on the sale of assets, related party
|
—
|
—
|
13,883
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||||
Interest
income
|
708
|
299
|
252
|
417
|
1,037
|
|||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(199
|
)
|
(137
|
)
|
(177
|
)
|
(126
|
)
|
(241
|
)
|
||||||
Other
income (expense)
|
(27
|
)
|
(55
|
)
|
15
|
87
|
(22
|
)
|
||||||||
Equity
loss in investments
|
(74
|
)
|
(4,172
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
(882
|
)
|
||||||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(25,447
|
)
|
$
|
(26,538
|
)
|
$
|
(2,090
|
)
|
$
|
(9,283
|
)
|
$
|
(13,003
|
)
|
|
Basic
and diluted net loss per share
|
$
|
(1.53
|
)
|
$
|
(1.80
|
)
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
$
|
(0.64
|
)
|
$
|
(0.91
|
)
|
|
Basic
and diluted weighted average common shares
|
16,603,550
|
14,704,281
|
13,932,390
|
14,555,047
|
14,274,254
|
|||||||||||
Statements
of Cash Flows Data:
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
$
|
(16,483
|
)
|
$
|
(1,101
|
)
|
$
|
(12,574
|
)
|
$
|
(7,245
|
)
|
$
|
(6,886
|
)
|
|
Net
cash provided by investing activities
|
591
|
911
|
13,425
|
5,954
|
17,265
|
|||||||||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
16,787
|
5,357
|
(831
|
)
|
(997
|
)
|
(7,971
|
)
|
||||||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash
|
895
|
5,167
|
20
|
(2,288
|
)
|
2,408
|
||||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
8,007
|
2,840
|
2,820
|
5,108
|
2,700
|
|||||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of year
|
$
|
8,902
|
$
|
8,007
|
$
|
2,840
|
$
|
2,820
|
$
|
5,108
|
||||||
Balance
Sheet Data:
|
||||||||||||||||
Cash,
cash equivalents and short-term investments
|
$
|
12,878
|
$
|
15,845
|
$
|
13,419
|
$
|
14,268
|
$
|
24,983
|
||||||
Working
capital
|
7,392
|
10,459
|
12,458
|
12,432
|
25,283
|
|||||||||||
Total
assets
|
24,868
|
28,166
|
25,470
|
28,089
|
39,319
|
|||||||||||
Deferred
revenues
|
2,389
|
2,541
|
2,592
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||||
Deferred
revenues, related party
|
23,906
|
17,311
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||||
Option
liabilities
|
900
|
5,331
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||||
Deferred
gain on sale of assets
|
—
|
—
|
5,650
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||||
Deferred
gain on sale of assets, related party
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
7,539
|
9,623
|
|||||||||||
Long-term
deferred rent
|
741
|
573
|
80
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||||
Long-term
obligations, less current portion
|
1,159
|
1,558
|
1,128
|
1,157
|
770
|
|||||||||||
Total
stockholders’ equity (deficit)
|
$
|
(10,813
|
)
|
$
|
(6,229
|
)
|
$
|
12,833
|
$
|
14,909
|
$
|
25,995
|
· |
Olympus
paid $30,000,000 for its 50% interest in the Joint Venture. Moreover,
Olympus simultaneously entered into a License/Joint Development
Agreement
with the Joint Venture and us to develop a second generation commercial
system and manufacturing capabilities.
|
· |
We
licensed our device technology, including the Celution™ System and certain
related intellectual property, to the Joint Venture for use in
future
generation devices. These devices will process and purify adult
stem and
regenerative cells residing in adipose (fat) tissue for various
therapeutic clinical applications. In exchange for this license,
we
received a 50% interest in the Joint Venture, as well as an initial
$11,000,000 payment from the Joint Venture; the source of this
payment was
the $30,000,000 contributed to the Joint Venture by Olympus. Moreover,
upon receipt of a CE mark for the first generation Celution™ System in
January 2006, we received an additional $11,000,000 development
milestone
payment from the Joint Venture.
|
December
31, 2006
|
December
31, 2005
|
November
4, 2005
|
||||||||
Expected
volatility of Cytori
|
66.00
|
%
|
63.20
|
%
|
63.20
|
%
|
||||
Expected
volatility of the Joint Venture
|
56.60
|
%
|
69.10
|
%
|
69.10
|
%
|
||||
Bankruptcy
recovery rate for Cytori
|
21.00
|
%
|
21.00
|
%
|
21.00
|
%
|
||||
Bankruptcy
threshold for Cytori
|
$
|
10,110,000
|
$
|
10,780,000
|
$
|
10,780,000
|
||||
Probability
of a change of control event for Cytori
|
1.94
|
%
|
3.04
|
%
|
3.04
|
%
|
||||
Expected
correlation between fair values of Cytori and the Joint Venture
in the
future
|
99.00
|
%
|
99.00
|
%
|
99.00
|
%
|
||||
Risk
free interest rate
|
4.71
|
%
|
4.39
|
%
|
4.66
|
%
|
· |
Spinal
field, exclusive at least until 2012, and
|
· |
Field
of regenerative medicine, non-exclusive on a perpetual
basis.
|
· |
Anti-adhesion,
|
· |
Soft
tissue support, and
|
· |
Minimization
of the attachment of soft tissues throughout the
body.
|
· |
Existing
cash and short-term investments;
|
· |
Potential
future financings,
|
· |
Payments,
if any, related to potential Celution™ System commercialization
partnerships or stem cell banking licensing
agreements
|
· |
Payments,
if any, related to potential biomaterial product line divestitures;
and
|
· |
Potential
research grants
|
Years
ended
|
$
Differences
|
%
Differences
|
||||||||||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
2006
to 2005
|
2005
to 2004
|
2006
to 2005
|
2005
to 2004
|
||||||||||||||||
Product
Revenues:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Spine
and orthopedics products
|
$
|
1,451,000
|
$
|
5,634,000
|
$
|
3,803,000
|
$
|
(4,183,000
|
)
|
$
|
1,831,000
|
(74.2
|
)%
|
48.1
|
%
|
|||||||
Thin
film products:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Product
sales (non-MAST related)
|
—
|
—
|
559,000
|
—
|
(559,000
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||||||||
Product
sales to MAST
|
—
|
—
|
906,000
|
—
|
(906,000
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||||||||
Amortization
of gain on sale (MAST)
|
—
|
—
|
772,000
|
—
|
(772,000
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||||||||
|
—
|
—
|
2,237,000
|
—
|
(2,237,000
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||||||||
CMF
products:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Product
sales
|
—
|
—
|
126,000
|
—
|
(126,000
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||||||||
Amortization
of gain on sale
|
—
|
—
|
156,000
|
—
|
(156,000
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||||||||
|
—
|
282,000
|
—
|
(282,000
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
product revenues
|
$
|
1,451,000
|
$
|
5,634,000
|
$
|
6,322,000
|
$
|
(4,183,000
|
)
|
$
|
(688,000
|
)
|
(74.2
|
)%
|
(10.9
|
)%
|
||||||
%
attributable to Medtronic
|
100
|
%
|
100
|
%
|
64.6
|
%
|
· |
Spine
and orthopedic product revenues represent sales of bioresorbable
implants
used in spine and orthopedic surgical procedures. For the years
ended
December 31, 2006 and 2005, these revenues were primarily related
to
orders for our radiographically identifiable Spine System products,
marketed under the name MYSTIQUE™, which Medtronic, our sole distributor
of spine and orthopedic products, launched in the third quarter
of 2005.
However, subsequent to the initial product launch, Medtronic has
substantially decreased its orders of this product, and we are
concerned
about Medtronic’s ongoing level of commitment to this product. As a result
of this decrease, we experienced negative profit margins for our
MacroPore
Biosurgery segment for the year ended December 31, 2006. As a result,
we
are actively seeking a buyer (or buyers) for this line of
business.
|
Medtronic
owned approximately 5.34% of our outstanding common stock as of
December
31, 2006 (4.45% after our February 28, 2007 stock
issuance).
|
· |
Thin
Film product revenues in 2004 represent sales of SurgiWrap™ bioresorbable
Thin Film. We sold most, but not all, of our intellectual property
rights
and tangible assets related to our Thin Film product line to MAST
Biosurgery in the second quarter of 2004. We were obliged by contract
to
act as a back-up supplier for these products and to sell them to
MAST at
our manufacturing costs. However, as MAST assumed the manufacturing
process, domestic revenue from Thin Film products ended in 2004.
No
revenues from the Thin Film product line were recognized during
the years
ended December 31, 2006 and 2005. We have never received any Thin
Film
revenues from Japan, because the MHLW has not approved Thin Film
for sale
in Japan yet.
|
· |
The
CMF product revenues represent sales of the CMF surgical implants
product
line used for trauma and reconstructive procedures in the mid-face
and
craniofacial skeleton (the head and skull). We sold this product
line to
Medtronic in 2002. As with the Thin Film products, we sold CMF
products at
cost in 2004 under a contractual back-up supply agreement with
Medtronic.
A portion of the deferred gain on sale of assets, related party
was
recognized as revenue in order to reflect the fair value of products
sold,
based on historical selling prices of similar products, over our
manufacturing cost. During the third quarter of 2004, we completed
all
remaining performance obligations related to the 2002 sale of the
CMF
product line to Medtronic. Therefore, we did not earn any CMF product
revenues during the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 and
will not
generate revenue from this product line in the future.
|
Years
ended
|
$
and % Differences
|
%
Differences
|
||||||||||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
2006
to 2005
|
2005
to 2004
|
2006
to 2005
|
2005
to 2004
|
||||||||||||||||
Cost
of product revenues:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost
of product revenues
|
$
|
1,472,000
|
$
|
2,874,000
|
$
|
3,139,000
|
$
|
(1,402,000
|
)
|
$
|
(265,000
|
)
|
(48.8
|
)%
|
(8.4
|
)%
|
||||||
%
of product revenues
|
101.4
|
%
|
51.0
|
%
|
49.7
|
%
|
50.4
|
%
|
1.3
|
%
|
98.8
|
%
|
2.6
|
%
|
||||||||
Inventory
provision
|
88,000
|
280,000
|
242,000
|
(192,000
|
)
|
38,000
|
(68.6
|
)%
|
15.7
|
%
|
||||||||||||
%
of product revenues
|
6.1
|
%
|
5.0
|
%
|
3.8
|
%
|
1.1
|
%
|
1.2
|
%
|
22.0
|
%
|
31.6
|
%
|
||||||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
74,000
|
—
|
3,000
|
74,000
|
(3,000
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||||||||
%
of product revenues
|
5.1
|
%
|
—
|
—
|
5.1
|
%
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||||||
Total
cost of product revenues
|
$
|
1,634,000
|
$
|
3,154,000
|
$
|
3,384,000
|
$
|
(1,520,000
|
)
|
$
|
(230,000
|
)
|
(48.2
|
)%
|
(6.8
|
)%
|
||||||
Total
cost of product revenues as % of Product revenues
|
112.6
|
%
|
56.0
|
%
|
53.5
|
%
|
· |
Our
product revenues are currently generated only through sales of
bioresorbable products and therefore, cost of revenues is related
only to
our MacroPore Biosurgery segment.
|
· |
The
change in cost of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2006
as
compared to the same period in 2005 as well as between 2005 and
2004 were
due primarily to amounts of fixed labor and overhead costs applied
to
product revenues in each period. As MacroPore revenues have declined,
gross margins have been negatively affected by fixed costs.
|
· |
In
response to MacroPore Biosurgery’s declining revenues, we are seeking to
reduce expenses. We reduced our headcount by 29 people in the third
quarter of 2006. A portion of the affected personnel related to
the
MacroPore Biosurgery segment.
|
· |
Cost
of product revenues includes approximately $74,000, $0 and $3,000
of
stock-based compensation expense for the years ended December 31,
2006,
2005 and 2004, respectively. For further details, see stock-based
compensation discussion below.
|
· |
During
the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, we recorded
a provision
of $88,000, $280,000, and $242,000, respectively, related primarily
to
excess and slow-moving inventory. In 2006 and 2005, this inventory
was
produced in anticipation of stocking orders from Medtronic which
did not
materialize.
|
· |
The
$242,000 inventory provision during 2004 related to excess inventory
produced in consideration of our responsibility to be a back-up
supplier
for the CMF product line. We sold the assets related to this product
line
to a subsidiary of Medtronic in September 2002. In April of
2004, Medtronic indicated that it would no longer purchase CMF
inventory
from us under the back-up supply arrangement, leading to our determination
that the remaining CMF inventory on hand would not be recoverable.
|
Years
ended
|
$
Differences
|
%
Differences
|
||||||||||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
2006
to 2005
|
2005
to 2004
|
2006
to 2005
|
2005
to 2004
|
||||||||||||||||
Regenerative
cell technology:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Milestone
revenue (Olympus)
|
$
|
5,905,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
5,905,000
|
$
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||||
Research
grant (NIH)
|
310,000
|
312,000
|
328,000
|
(2,000
|
)
|
(16,000
|
)
|
(0.6
|
)%
|
(4.9
|
)%
|
|||||||||||
Regenerative
cell storage services
|
7,000
|
8,000
|
10,000
|
(1,000
|
)
|
(2,000
|
)
|
(12.5
|
)%
|
(20.0
|
)%
|
|||||||||||
Other
|
102,000
|
—
|
—
|
102,000
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
regenerative cell technology
|
6,324,000
|
320,000
|
338,000
|
6,004,000
|
(18,000
|
)
|
1,876.3
|
%
|
(5.3
|
)%
|
||||||||||||
MacroPore
Biosurgery:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Development
(Senko)
|
152,000
|
51,000
|
158,000
|
101,000
|
(107,000
|
)
|
198.0
|
%
|
(67.7
|
)%
|
||||||||||||
Total
development revenues
|
$
|
6,476,000
|
$
|
371,000
|
$
|
496,000
|
$
|
6,105,000
|
$
|
(125,000
|
)
|
1,645.6
|
%
|
(25.2
|
)%
|
· |
We
recognize deferred revenues, related party, as development revenue
when
certain performance obligations are met (i.e., using a proportional
performance approach). During the year ended December 31, 2006,
we
recognized $5,905,000 of revenue associated with our arrangements
with
Olympus. The revenue recognized in 2006 was a result of completing
a
pre-clinical study in the first quarter of 2006, receiving a CE
mark for
the first generation Celution™ System, and reaching three additional
milestones in the fourth quarter of 2006. One milestone related
to the
completion of a pre-clinical study while the other two were results
of
product development efforts. There was no similar revenue in
2005.
|
· |
The
research grant revenue relates to our agreement with the National
Institutes of Health (“NIH”). Under this arrangement, the NIH reimburses
us for “qualifying expenditures” related to research on Adipose-Derived
Cell Therapy for Myocardial Infarction. To receive funds under
the grant
arrangement, we are required to (i) demonstrate that we incurred
“qualifying expenses,” as defined in the grant agreement between the NIH
and us, (ii) maintain a system of controls, whereby we can accurately
track and report all expenditures related solely to research on
Adipose-Derived Cell Therapy for Myocardial Infarction, and (iii)
file
appropriate forms and follow appropriate protocols established
by the
NIH.
|
· |
Upon
notifying Senko of completion of the initial regulatory application
to the
MHLW for the Thin Film product, we were entitled to a nonrefundable
payment of $1,250,000. We so notified Senko on September 28, 2004,
received payment in October of 2004, and recorded deferred revenues
of
$1,250,000. As of December 31, 2006, of the amount deferred, we
have
recognized development revenues of $361,000 ($152,000 in 2006,
$51,000 in
2005, and $158,000 in 2004).
|
· |
We
are also entitled to a nonrefundable payment of $250,000 once we
achieve
commercialization.
|
· |
Finally,
under this agreement, we also received a $1,500,000 license fee
that was
recorded as a component of deferred revenues in the accompanying
balance
sheet. Because the $1,500,000 in license fees is potentially refundable,
such amounts will not be recognized as revenues until the refund
rights
expire. Specifically, half of the license fee is refundable if
the parties
agree commercialization is not achievable and a proportional amount
is
refundable if we terminate the arrangement, other than for material
breach
by Senko, before three years post-commercialization.
|
Years
ended
|
$
Differences
|
%
Differences
|
||||||||||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
2006
to 2005
|
2005
to 2004
|
2006
to 2005
|
2005
to 2004
|
||||||||||||||||
Regenerative
cell technology:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Regenerative
cell technology
|
$
|
11,967,000
|
$
|
11,487,000
|
$
|
6,910,000
|
$
|
480,000
|
$
|
4,577,000
|
4.2
|
%
|
66.2
|
%
|
||||||||
Development
milestone (Joint Venture)
|
7,286,000
|
1,136,000
|
—
|
6,150,000
|
1,136,000
|
541.4
|
%
|
—
|
||||||||||||||
Research
grants (NIH)
|
479,000
|
306,000
|
339,000
|
173,000
|
(33,000
|
)
|
56.5
|
%
|
(9.7
|
)%
|
||||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
1,015,000
|
67,000
|
—
|
948,000
|
67,000
|
1,414.9
|
%
|
—
|
||||||||||||||
Total
regenerative cell technology
|
20,747,000
|
12,996,000
|
7,249,000
|
7,751,000
|
5,747,000
|
59.6
|
%
|
79.3
|
%
|
|||||||||||||
MacroPore
Biosurgery:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Bioresorbable
polymer implants
|
1,027,000
|
2,213,000
|
2,933,000
|
(1,186,000
|
)
|
(720,000
|
)
|
(53.6
|
)%
|
(24.5
|
)%
|
|||||||||||
Development
milestone (Senko)
|
178,000
|
129,000
|
170,000
|
49,000
|
(41,000
|
)
|
38.0
|
%
|
(24.1
|
)%
|
||||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
25,000
|
112,000
|
32,000
|
(87,000
|
)
|
80,000
|
(77.7
|
)%
|
250.0
|
%
|
||||||||||||
Total
MacroPore Biosurgery
|
1,230,000
|
2,454,000
|
3,135,000
|
(1,224,000
|
)
|
(681,000
|
)
|
(49.9
|
)%
|
(21.7
|
)%
|
|||||||||||
Total
research and development expenses
|
$
|
21,977,000
|
$
|
15,450,000
|
$
|
10,384,000
|
$
|
6,527,000
|
$
|
5,066,000
|
42.2
|
%
|
48.8
|
%
|
· |
Regenerative
cell technology expenses relate to the development of a technology
platform that involves using adipose (fat) tissue as a source for
autologous regenerative cells for therapeutic applications. These
expenses, in conjunction with our continued development efforts
related to
our Celution™ System, result primarily from the broad expansion of our
research and development efforts enabled by the funding we received
from
Olympus in 2005 and 2006. Labor-related expenses increased by $2,315,000
for the year ended December 31, 2006 as compared to the same period
in
2005. This increase does not include the $948,000 increase in stock-based
compensation for the year ended December 31, 2006 as compared to
2005.
Professional services expense, which includes pre-clinical and
clinical
study costs, increased by $1,772,000 for the year ended December
31, 2006
as compared to the same period in 2005. Rent and utilities expense
increased by $767,000 from 2005 to 2006 as a result of the addition
of our
new facility. Production and other supplies increased by $689,000
during
the year ended December 31, 2006 as compared to 2005. Other notable
increases included repairs and maintenance of $486,000 and depreciation
expense increases of $581,000, for the year ended December 31,
2006,
respectively, as compared to the same period in 2005. The remaining
increase of $193,000 related to miscellaneous charges, such as
regulatory
costs.
|
The
increase in regenerative cell technology expenses from 2004 to
2005 was
due primarily to the hiring of additional researchers, engineers,
and
support staff. It was also a result of increased costs for pre-clinical
studies conducted in 2005 as compared with 2004 as well as increased
rent
and utility expense due to the addition of our new facility during
the
latter half of 2005.
|
· |
Expenditures
related to the Joint Venture with Olympus, which are included in
the
variation analysis above, include costs that are necessary to support
the
commercialization of future generation devices based on our Celution™
System. These development activities, which began in November 2005,
include performing pre-clinical and clinical studies, seeking regulatory
approval, and performing product development related to therapeutic
applications for adipose stem and regenerative cells for multiple
large
markets. For the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, costs
associated
with the development of the device were $7,286,000 and $1,136,000,
respectively. These expenses were composed of $3,663,000 and $565,000
in
labor and related benefits, $2,405,000 and $571,000 in consulting
and
other professional services, $872,000 and $0 in supplies and $346,000
and
$0 in other miscellaneous expense, respectively. There were no
comparable
expenditures in 2004.
|
· |
In
2004, we entered into an agreement with the NIH to reimburse us
for up to
$950,000 (Phase I $100,000 and Phase II $850,000) in “qualifying
expenditures” related to research on Adipose-Derived Cell Therapy for
Myocardial Infarction. For the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005,
and
2004, we incurred $479,000, $306,000 and $339,000, respectively,
of direct
expenses relating entirely to Phase I and II. Of these expenses,
$169,000
and $11,000 were not reimbursed in 2006 and 2004, respectively.
To date,
we have incurred $1,125,000 of direct expenses ($180,000 of which
were not
reimbursed) relating to both Phases I and II of the agreement.
Our work
under the NIH agreement was completed during 2006.
|
· |
Stock-based
compensation for the regenerative cell technology segment of research
and
development was $1,015,000 and $67,000 for the years ended December
31,
2006 and 2005. There was no similar expenditure in 2004. See stock-based
compensation discussion below for more
details.
|
· |
Our
bioresorbable surgical implants platform technology is used for
development of spine and orthopedic products and Thin Film products.
The
decrease in research and development costs associated with bioresorbable
implants for the year ended December 31, 2006 as compared with
the same
period in 2005 and 2004 was due primarily to our ongoing strategy
of
reallocating resources toward our regenerative cell technology
segment.
Labor and related benefits expense, including stock-based compensation,
decreased by $778,000 for the year ended December 31, 2006 as compared
to
2005. In July 2006, we laid off 29 employees, a portion of which
related
to the MacroPore Biosurgery business. Other notable decreases from
2005 to
2006 were caused by decreases in travel and entertainment, professional
services, and depreciation expense.
|
Notable
decreases from 2004 to 2005 were caused by decreases in labor and
related
benefit expense, as well as decreases in professional service expense
and
pre-clinical expense.
|
· |
Under
a Distribution Agreement with Senko we are responsible for the
completion
of the initial regulatory application to the MHLW and commercialization
of
the Thin Film product line in Japan. Commercialization occurs when
one or
more Thin Film product registrations are completed with the MHLW.
During
the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, we incurred $178,000,
$129,000 and $170,000, respectively, of expenses related to this
regulatory and registration process.
|
· |
Stock-based
compensation for the MacroPore Biosurgery segment of research and
development for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004
was
$25,000, $112,000 and $32,000, respectively. See stock-based compensation
discussion below for more details.
|
Years
ended
|
$
Differences
|
%
Differences
|
||||||||||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
2006
to 2005
|
2005
to 2004
|
2006
to 2005
|
2005
to 2004
|
||||||||||||||||
Regenerative
cell technology:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
International
sales and marketing
|
$
|
1,271,000
|
$
|
494,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
777,000
|
$
|
494,000
|
157.3
|
%
|
—
|
|||||||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
517,000
|
—
|
—
|
517,000
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
regenerative cell technology
|
1,788,000
|
494,000
|
—
|
1,294,000
|
494,000
|
261.9
|
%
|
—
|
||||||||||||||
MacroPore
Biosurgery:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
General
corporate marketing
|
154,000
|
388,000
|
769,000
|
(234,000
|
)
|
(381,000
|
)
|
(60.3
|
)%
|
(49.5
|
)%
|
|||||||||||
Domestic
sales and marketing
|
—
|
—
|
846,000
|
—
|
(846,000
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||||||||
International
sales and marketing
|
104,000
|
552,000
|
776,000
|
(448,000
|
)
|
(224,000
|
)
|
(81.2
|
)%
|
(28.9
|
)%
|
|||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
9,000
|
113,000
|
22,000
|
(104,000
|
)
|
91,000
|
(92.0
|
)%
|
413.6
|
%
|
||||||||||||
Total
MacroPore Biosurgery
|
267,000
|
1,053,000
|
2,413,000
|
(786,000
|
)
|
(1,360,000
|
)
|
(74.6
|
)%
|
(56.4
|
)%
|
|||||||||||
Total
sales and marketing
|
$
|
2,055,000
|
$
|
1,547,000
|
$
|
2,413,000
|
$
|
508,000
|
$
|
(866,000
|
)
|
32.8
|
%
|
(35.9
|
)%
|
· |
International
sales and marketing expenditures for the years ended December 31,
2006 and
2005 relate primarily to salaries expense for employees involved
in
business development. The main emphasis of these newly-formed functions
is
to seek strategic alliances and/or co-development partners for
our
regenerative cell technology, which we began to focus on in the
third
quarter of 2005. There were no similar expenses in
2004.
|
· |
Stock-based
compensation for the regenerative cell segment of sales and marketing
for
the year ended December 31, 2006 was $517,000. There was no similar
expense in 2005 or 2004. See stock-based compensation discussion
below for
more details.
|
· |
General
corporate marketing expenditures relate to expenditures for maintaining
our corporate image and reputation within the research and surgical
communities. The decrease from the year ended December 31, 2006
as
compared to 2005 was due to a strategic decision to allocate resources
towards our regenerative cell technology marketing, which in turn
prompted
a reduction in headcount in biomaterials and general corporate
marketing.
The decrease in 2005 as compared to 2004 was due to one-time costs
incurred for an educational program we created in 2004 to inform
end-users
and distributors of the benefits and surgical applications for our
biomaterials products.
|
· |
Domestic
sales and marketing expenditures related to expenses associated
with
managing our domestic bioresorbable Thin Film product distribution,
which
included independent sales representatives and our domestic Thin
Film
sales consultants and marketing staff. The elimination of such
expenses in
2005 was due to the transfer of our sales force and marketing staff
to
MAST upon the sale of the Thin Film product line to MAST in May
2004.
|
· |
International
sales and marketing expenditures relate to costs associated with
developing an international bioresorbable Thin Film distributor
and
supporting a bioresorbable Thin Film sales office in Japan. The
decreased
spending in 2006 and 2005 as compared to 2004 relates to a significant
headcount decrease in this marketing group as MHLW approval for
commercialization has been delayed from our original expectation.
|
· |
Stock-based
compensation for the MacroPore Biosurgery segment of sales and
marketing
for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $9,000,
$113,000
and $22,000, respectively. See stock-based compensation discussion
below
for more details.
|
Years
ended
|
$
Differences
|
%
Differences
|
||||||||||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
2006
to 2005
|
2005
to 2004
|
2006
to 2005
|
2005
to 2004
|
||||||||||||||||
General
and administrative
|
$
|
10,967,000
|
$
|
10,096,000
|
$
|
6,480,000
|
$
|
871,000
|
$
|
3,616,000
|
8.6
|
%
|
55.8
|
%
|
||||||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
1,580,000
|
112,000
|
71,000
|
1,468,000
|
41,000
|
1,310.7
|
%
|
57.7
|
%
|
|||||||||||||
Total
general and administrative expenses
|
$
|
12,547,000
|
$
|
10,208,000
|
$
|
6,551,000
|
$
|
2,339,000
|
$
|
3,657,000
|
22.9
|
%
|
55.8
|
%
|
· |
General
and administrative expense, for the year ended December 31, 2006
as
compared to the same period in 2005 increased by $2,339,000. This
was a
result of increased stock-based compensation of $1,468,000 as well
as
increases in other salary and related benefit expense of $677,000.
Professional services for the year ended December 31, 2006 as compared
with 2005 increased by $935,000, which includes an increase of
$777,000 in
legal expenses partly incurred in connection with the University
of
Pittsburgh’s lawsuit challenging the inventorship of our licensor’s U.S.
patent relating to adult stem cells isolated from adipose tissue.
Also contributing $487,000 to the lincrease in legal expense was
the
issuance of 100,000 shares of stock to the Regents of the University
of
California ("UC") at a stock price of $4.87 per share. This was a
result of an amended technology license agreement that was finalized
in
the third quarter of 2006.
|
Salary
and related benefit expense increased by $981,000 during the year
ended
December 31, 2005, with respect to the same period in 2004. This
increase
was primarily caused by the addition of seven managerial employees.
Legal
expenses also increased for the year ended December 31, 2005 as
compared
to the same period in 2004 primarily in connection with the lawsuit
mentioned above. Other notable expenditures were additional professional
services costs and higher travel
expenditures.
|
· |
In
the second and fourth quarters of 2006, we recorded an additional
$118,000
and $103,000 of depreciation expense to accelerate the estimated
remaining
lives for certain assets determined to be no longer in use. The
second
quarter assets related to furniture and fixtures no longer in use
due to
our recent relocation as well as outdated computer software and
related
equipment. The assets related to both our regenerative cell technology
and
MacroPore Biosurgery operating segments. We recorded the charge
as an
increase to general and administrative expenses. The fourth quarter
assets
related to leasehold improvements that had a shortened useful life
due to
the termination of one of our leases. The charge was allocated
to each
department based on square footage occupied at this terminated
location.
|
· |
Stock-based
compensation related to general and administrative expense for
the years
ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $1,580,000, $112,000
and
$71,000, respectively. See stock-based compensation discussion
below for
more details.
|
Years
ended
|
$
Differences
|
%
Differences
|
||||||||||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
2006
to 2005
|
2005
to 2004
|
2006
to 2005
|
2005
to 2004
|
||||||||||||||||
Regenerative
cell technology:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Research
and development related
|
$
|
1,015,000
|
$
|
67,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
948,000
|
$
|
67,000
|
1,414.9
|
%
|
—
|
|||||||||
Sales
and marketing related
|
517,000
|
—
|
—
|
517,000
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
regenerative cell technology
|
1,532,000
|
67,000
|
—
|
1,465,000
|
67,000
|
2,186.6
|
%
|
—
|
||||||||||||||
MacroPore
Biosurgery:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost
of product revenues
|
74,000
|
—
|
3,000
|
74,000
|
(3,000
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||||||||
Research
and development related
|
25,000
|
112,000
|
32,000
|
(87,000
|
)
|
80,000
|
(77.7
|
)%
|
250.0
|
%
|
||||||||||||
Sales
and marketing related
|
9,000
|
113,000
|
22,000
|
(104,000
|
)
|
91,000
|
(92.0
|
)%
|
413.6
|
%
|
||||||||||||
Total
MacroPore Biosurgery
|
108,000
|
225,000
|
57,000
|
(117,000
|
)
|
168,000
|
(52.0
|
)%
|
294.7
|
%
|
||||||||||||
General
and administrative related
|
1,580,000
|
112,000
|
71,000
|
1,468,000
|
41,000
|
1,310.7
|
%
|
57.7
|
%
|
|||||||||||||
Total
stock-based compensation
|
$
|
3,220,000
|
$
|
404,000
|
$
|
128,000
|
$
|
2,816,000
|
$
|
276,000
|
697.0
|
%
|
215.6
|
%
|
· |
In
the first quarter of 2006, we issued 2,500 shares of restricted
common
stock to a non-employee scientific advisor. Similarly, in the second
quarter of 2005, we issued 20,000 shares of restricted common stock
to a
non-employee scientific advisor. The stock is restricted in that
it cannot
be sold for a specified period of time. There are no vesting requirements.
Because the shares issued are not subject to additional future
vesting or
service requirements, the stock-based compensation expense of $18,000
recorded in the first quarter of 2006 (and $63,000 recorded in
the second
quarter of 2005) constitutes the entire expense related to these
grants,
and no future period charges will be reported. The scientific advisors
also receive cash consideration as services are performed.
|
· |
Of
the $3,220,000 charge to stock-based compensation for the year
ended
December 31, 2006, $567,000 related to extensions and cancellations
of
awards previously granted to (a) our former Senior Vice President
of
Finance and Administration, who retired in May 2006, and (b) (i)
our
former Senior Vice President, Business Development, (ii) our former
Vice
President, Marketing and Development, and (iii) the position of
a less
senior employee, whose positions were eliminated during 2006. The
charge
reflects the incremental fair value of the extended vested stock
options
over the fair value of the original awards at the modification
date as
well as the acceleration of unrecognized compensation cost associated
with
cancelled option awards that would have been recognized if the
four
individuals continued to vest in their options until the end of
their
employment term. There will be no further charges related to these
modifications.
|
· |
In
August 2005, our Chief Operating Officer (“COO”), ceased employment with
us. We agreed to pay the former COO a lump sum cash severance payment
of
$155,164 and extended the exercise period for two years on 253,743
vested
stock options. The incremental value of the options due to the
modification was $337,000. We recorded an expense in the third
quarter of
2005 to reflect the lump sum cash severance payment and the value
of the
vested stock options, which constitutes the entire expense related
to
these options, and no future period charges will be required. This
$337,000 was allocated in the table above in equal portions among
three
departmental categories, consistent with previous allocations of
the
former COO’s compensation expense.
|
Years
ended
|
$
Differences
|
%
Differences
|
||||||||||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
2006
to
2005
|
2005
to
2004
|
2006
to
2005
|
2005
to 2004
|
||||||||||||||||
Change
in fair value of option liability
|
$
|
(3,731,000
|
)
|
$
|
3,545,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
(7,276,000
|
)
|
$
|
3,545,000
|
(205.2
|
)%
|
—
|
|||||||
Change
in fair value of put option liability
|
(700,000
|
)
|
100,000
|
—
|
(800,000
|
)
|
100,000
|
(800.0
|
)%
|
—
|
||||||||||||
Total
change in fair value of option liabilities
|
$
|
(4,431,000
|
)
|
$
|
3,645,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
(8,076,000
|
)
|
$
|
3,645,000
|
(221.6
|
)%
|
—
|
· |
We
granted Olympus an option to acquire 2,200,000 shares of our common
stock
which expired December 31, 2006. The exercise price of the option
shares
was $10 per share. We had accounted for this grant as a liability
because
had the option been exercised, we would have been required to deliver
listed shares of our common stock to settle the option shares.
In
accordance with EITF 00-19, “Accounting for Derivative Financial
Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own
Stock,” the fair value of this option was re-measured at the end of each
quarter, using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, with the
movement
in fair value reported in the statement of operations as a change
in fair
value of option liabilities.
|
· |
In
reference to the Joint Venture, the Shareholders’ Agreement between Cytori
and Olympus provides that in certain specified circumstances of
insolvency
or if we experience a change in control, Olympus will have the
rights to
(i) repurchase our interests in the Joint Venture at the fair value
of
such interests or (ii) sell its own interests in the Joint Venture
to us
at the higher of (a) $22,000,000 or (b) the Put’s fair value. The Put
value has been classified as a liability.
|
The
valuations of the Put were completed by an independent valuation
firm
using an option pricing theory based simulation analysis (i.e.,
a Monte
Carlo simulation). The valuations are based on assumptions as of
the
valuation date with regard to the market value of Cytori and the
estimated
fair value of the Joint Venture, the expected correlation between
the
values of Cytori and the Joint Venture, the expected volatility
of Cytori
and the Joint Venture, the bankruptcy recovery rate for Cytori,
the
bankruptcy threshold for Cytori, the probability of a change of
control
event for Cytori, and the risk free interest
rate.
|
December
31, 2006
|
December
31, 2005
|
November
4, 2005
|
||||||||
Expected
volatility of Cytori
|
66.00
|
%
|
63.20
|
%
|
63.20
|
%
|
||||
Expected
volatility of the Joint Venture
|
56.60
|
%
|
69.10
|
%
|
69.10
|
%
|
||||
Bankruptcy
recovery rate for Cytori
|
21.00
|
%
|
21.00
|
%
|
21.00
|
%
|
||||
Bankruptcy
threshold for Cytori
|
$
|
10,110,000
|
$
|
10,780,000
|
$
|
10,780,000
|
||||
Probability
of a change of control event for Cytori
|
1.94
|
%
|
3.04
|
%
|
3.04
|
%
|
||||
Expected
correlation between fair values of Cytori and the Joint Venture
in the
future
|
99.00
|
%
|
99.00
|
%
|
99.00
|
%
|
||||
Risk
free interest rate
|
4.71
|
%
|
4.39
|
%
|
4.66
|
%
|
Years ended
|
$
Differences
|
% Differences
|
||||||||||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
2006 to 2005
|
2005 to 2004
|
2006 to 2005
|
2005 to 2004
|
||||||||||||||||
Restructuring
charge
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
107,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
(107,000
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
%
|
Years ended
|
$
Differences
|
% Differences
|
||||||||||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
2006 to 2005
|
2005 to 2004
|
2006 to 2005
|
2005 to 2004
|
||||||||||||||||
Equipment
impairment charge
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
42,000
|
$
|
$(42,000
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
Years
ended
|
$
Differences
|
%
Differences
|
||||||||||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
2006
to
2005
|
2005
to
2004
|
2006
to
2005
|
2005
to 2004
|
||||||||||||||||
Gain
on the sale of assets
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
5,526,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
(5,526,000
|
)
|
$
|
5,526,000
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||
Gain
on the sale of assets, related party
|
—
|
—
|
13,883,000
|
—
|
(13,883,000
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||||||||
Total
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
5,526,000
|
$
|
13,883,000
|
$
|
(5,526,000
|
)
|
$
|
(8,357,000
|
)
|
—
|
(60.2
|
)%
|
· |
The
$5,526,000 gain on sale of assets recorded in the third quarter
of 2005
was related to the sale of the majority of our Thin Film product
line in
May 2004 to MAST. As part of the disposal arrangement, we agreed
to
complete certain performance obligations which prevented us from
recognizing the gain on sale of assets when the cash was initially
received. In August 2005, following the settlement of arbitration
proceedings related to the sale agreement, we were able to recognize
the
gain on sale of assets of $5,650,000, less $124,000 of related
deferred
costs, in the statement of
operations.
|
· |
The
gain on sale of assets, related party related to the initial payment
as
well as milestone payments from Medtronic for the disposition of
our CMF
product line in 2002. Specifically, as part of the disposal arrangement,
we agreed to complete clinical research regarding Faster Resorbable
Polymer, an area that directly relates to the CMF product line
we
transferred to Medtronic. In January 2004, we received the $5,000,000
payment after fulfilling the research requirements set out in the
CMF sale
agreement. We were also obliged to transfer certain “know-how,” including
manufacturing processes, patents, and other intellectual property,
to
Medtronic. This obligation was fulfilled and in the third quarter
of 2004
we received $1,500,000 from Medtronic. These milestones represented
the
last of all remaining performance obligations and therefore, we
were able
to recognize the remaining deferred gain on the sale of assets,
related
party, of $7,383,000, in the statement of operations.
|
Years
ended
|
$
Differences
|
%
Differences
|
||||||||||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
2006
to 2005
|
2005
to 2004
|
2006
to 2005
|
2005
to 2004
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
income
|
$
|
708,000
|
$
|
299,000
|
$
|
252,000
|
$
|
409,000
|
$
|
47,000
|
136.8
|
%
|
18.7
|
%
|
||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(199,000
|
)
|
(137,000
|
)
|
(177,000
|
)
|
(62,000
|
)
|
40,000
|
45.3
|
%
|
(22.6
|
)%
|
|||||||||
Other
income (expense)
|
(27,000
|
)
|
(55,000
|
)
|
15,000
|
28,000
|
(70,000
|
)
|
(50.9
|
)%
|
(466.7
|
)%
|
||||||||||
Total
|
$
|
482,000
|
$
|
107,000
|
$
|
90,000
|
$
|
375,000
|
$
|
17,000
|
350.5
|
%
|
18.9
|
%
|
· |
Interest
income increased in 2006 as compared to 2005 due to a larger balance
of
funds available for investment, which was a result of the transactions
with Olympus, as well as the sale of common stock in the third
quarter of
2006. Interest income also increased from 2004 to 2005 due to a
larger
balance of funds available for investment as well as higher returns
on
investments.
|
· |
Interest
expense increased in 2006 as compared to 2005 due to higher principal
balances on our long-term equipment-financed borrowings. In late
2005, we
executed an additional promissory note, with approximately $1,380,000
in
principal. Our newest promissory note, with approximately $600,000
in
principal, was executed in December 2006.
|
· |
The
changes in other income (expense) in 2006, 2005 and 2004 resulted
primarily from changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
|
Years
ended
|
$
Differences
|
%
Differences
|
||||||||||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
2006
to 2005
|
2005
to 2004
|
2006
to 2005
|
2005
to 2004
|
||||||||||||||||
Equity
loss from investment in joint venture
|
$
|
74,000
|
$
|
4,172,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
(4,098,000
|
)
|
$
|
4,172,000
|
(98.2
|
)%
|
—
|
Years
ended
|
$
Differences
|
%
Differences
|
||||||||||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
2006
to 2005
|
2005
to 2004
|
2006
to 2005
|
2005
to 2004
|
||||||||||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
8,902,000
|
$
|
8,007,000
|
$
|
2,840,000
|
$
|
895,000
|
$
|
5,167,000
|
11.2
|
181.9
|
%
|
|||||||||
Short-term
investments, available for sale
|
3,976,000
|
7,838,000
|
10,579,000
|
(3,862,000
|
)
|
(2,741,000
|
)
|
(49.3
|
)%
|
(25.9
|
)%
|
|||||||||||
Total
cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments, available
for
sale
|
$
|
12,878,000
|
$
|
15,845,000
|
$
|
13,419,000
|
$
|
(2,967,000
|
)
|
$
|
2,426,000
|
(18.7
|
)%
|
18.1
|
%
|
|||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Current
assets
|
$
|
13,978,000
|
$
|
17,540,000
|
$
|
15,645,000
|
$
|
(3,562,000
|
)
|
$
|
1,895,000
|
(20.3
|
)%
|
12.1
|
%
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities
|
6,586,000
|
7,081,000
|
3,187,000
|
(495,000
|
)
|
3,894,000
|
(7.0
|
)%
|
122.2
|
%
|
||||||||||||
Working
capital
|
$
|
7,392,000
|
$
|
10,459,000
|
$
|
12,458,000
|
$
|
(3,067,000
|
)
|
$
|
(1,999,000
|
)
|
(29.3
|
)%
|
(16.0
|
)%
|
· |
Issuing
our stock in pre-IPO transactions, in our 2000 initial public offering
in
Germany, and upon stock option
exercises,
|
· |
Generating
revenues,
|
· |
Selling
the bioresorbable implant CMF product line in September
2002,
|
· |
Selling
the bioresorbable implant Thin Film product line (except for the
territory
of Japan), in May 2004,
|
· |
Entering
into a Distribution Agreement for the distribution rights to Thin
Film in
Japan, in which we received an upfront license fee in July 2004
and an
initial development milestone payment in October
2004,
|
· |
Obtaining
a modest amount of capital equipment long-term
financing,
|
· |
Issuing
1,100,000 shares of common stock to Olympus under a Stock Purchase
Agreement which closed in May 2005,
|
· |
Entering
into a collaborative arrangement with Olympus in November 2005,
including
the formation of a joint venture called Olympus-Cytori, Inc.,
|
· |
Receiving
funds in exchange for granting Olympus an exclusive right to negotiate
in
February 2006, and
|
· |
Issuing
$16,800,000 of registered common stock under our shelf registration
statement in August 2006.
|
Payments
due by period
|
||||||||||||||||
Contractual
Obligations
|
Total
|
Less
than 1
year
|
1
- 3 years
|
3
- 5 years
|
More
than
5
years
|
|||||||||||
Long-term
obligations
|
$
|
2,158,000
|
$
|
999,000
|
$
|
1,159,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
||||||
Interest
commitment on long-term obligations
|
277,000
|
172,000
|
105,000
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||||
Operating
lease obligations
|
5,108,000
|
1,677,000
|
3,431,000
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||||
Pre-clinical
research study obligations
|
902,000
|
902,000
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||||
Clinical
research study obligations
|
6,631,000
|
4,796,000
|
1,835,000
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||||
Total
|
$
|
15,076,000
|
$
|
8,546,000
|
$
|
6,530,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
Years
Ended
|
||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
||||||||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
$
|
(16,483,000
|
)
|
$
|
(1,101,000
|
)
|
$
|
(12,574,000
|
)
|
|
Net
cash provided by investing activities
|
591,000
|
911,000
|
13,425,000
|
|||||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
16,787,000
|
5,357,000
|
(831,000
|
)
|
· |
Fees
for achieving certain defined milestones under research and/or
development
arrangements.
|
· |
Product
sales, and
|
· |
Payments
under license or distribution agreements.
|
· |
A
distribution license fee (which was paid at the outset of the
arrangement),
|
· |
Milestone
payments for achieving commercialization of the Thin Film product
line in
Japan,
|
· |
Training
for representatives of Senko,
|
· |
Sales
of Thin Film products to Senko, and
|
· |
Payments
in the nature of royalties on future product sales made by Senko
to its
end customers.
|
· |
The
delivered element has stand alone value to the customer,
|
· |
There
is objective evidence of the fair value of the remaining undelivered
elements, and
|
· |
If
the arrangement contains a general right of return related to any
products
delivered, delivery of the remaining goods and services is probable
and
within the complete control of the seller.
|
· |
Granting
the Joint Venture (which Olympus is considered to control) an exclusive
and perpetual manufacturing license to our device technology, including
the Celution™ System and certain related intellectual property;
and
|
· |
Performing
development activities in relation to certain therapeutic applications
associated with our Celution™ System, including completing pre-clinical
and clinical trials, seeking regulatory approval as appropriate,
and
assisting with product development.
|
· |
Upfront
License Fees/Milestones
|
o |
As
part of the Senko Distribution Agreement, we received an upfront
license
fee upon execution of the arrangement, which, as noted previously,
was not
separable under EITF 00-21. Accordingly, the license has been combined
with the development (milestones) element, which was separable,
to form a
single accounting unit. This single element of $3,000,000 in fees
includes
$1,500,000 which is potentially refundable. We have recognized,
and will
continue to recognize, the non-contingent fees allocated to this
combined
element as revenues as we complete each of the performance obligations
associated with the milestones component of this combined deliverable.
Note that the timing of when we have recognized revenues to date
does not
correspond with the cash we received upon achieving certain milestones.
For example, the first such milestone payment for $1,250,000 became
payable to us when we filed a commercialization application with
the
Japanese regulatory authorities. However, we determined that the
payment
received was not commensurate with the level of effort expended,
particularly when compared with other steps we believe are necessary
to
commercialize the Thin Film product line in Japan. Accordingly,
we did not
recognize the entire $1,250,000 received as revenues, but instead
all but
$361,000 of this amount is classified as deferred revenues. Approximately
$361,000 ($152,000 in 2006, $51,000 in 2005 and $158,000 in 2004)
has been
recognized to date as development revenues based on our estimates
of the
level of effort expended for completed milestones as compared with
the
total level of effort we expect to incur under the arrangement
to
successfully achieve regulatory approval of the Thin Film product
line in
Japan. These estimates were subject to judgment and there may be
changes
in estimates regarding the total level of effort as we continue
to seek
regulatory approval. In fact there can be no assurance that
commercialization in Japan will ever be achieved, although our
latest
understanding is that regulatory approval will be received in
2007.
|
o |
We
also received upfront fees as part of the Olympus arrangements
(although,
unlike in the Senko agreement, these fees were non-refundable).
Specifically, in exchange for an upfront fee, we granted the Joint
Venture
an exclusive, perpetual license to certain of our intellectual
property
and agreed to perform additional development activities. This upfront
fee
has been recorded in the liability account entitled deferred revenues,
related party, on our consolidated balance sheet. Similar to the
Senko
agreement, we have elected an accounting policy to recognize revenues
from
the combined license/development accounting unit as we perform
the
development services, as this represents our final obligation underlying
the combined accounting unit. Specifically, we plan to recognize
revenues
from the license/development accounting unit using a “proportional
performance” methodology, resulting in the de-recognition of amounts
recorded in the deferred revenues, related party, account as we
complete
various milestones underlying the development services. For instance,
we
have and will continue to recognize some of the deferred revenues,
related
party as revenues, related party, when we complete a pre-clinical
trial,
or obtain regulatory approval in a specific jurisdiction. Determining
what
portion of the deferred revenues, related party balance to recognize
as
each milestone is completed involves substantial judgment. In allocating
the balance of the deferred revenues, related party to various
milestones,
we had in-depth discussions with our operations personnel regarding
the
relative value of each milestone to the Joint Venture and Olympus.
We also
considered the cost of completing each milestone relative to the
total
costs we plan to incur in completing all of the development activities,
since we believe that the relative cost of completing a milestone
is a
reasonable proxy for its fair value. The accounting policy described
above
could result in revenues being recorded in an earlier accounting
period
than had other judgments or assumptions been made by
us.
|
· |
Government
Grants
|
o |
We
are eligible to receive grants from the NIH related to our research
on
adipose derived cell therapy to treat myocardial infarctions. There
are no
specific standards under U.S. GAAP that prescribe the recognition
or
classification of these grants in the statement of operations.
Absent such
guidance, we have established an accounting policy to recognize
NIH grant
revenues at the lesser of:
|
§ |
Qualifying
costs incurred (and not previously recognized), plus any allowable
grant
fees, for which Cytori is entitled to grant funding;
or,
|
§ |
The
amount determined by comparing the research outputs generated to
date
versus the total outputs that are expected to be achieved under
the entire
arrangement.
|
o |
Our
accounting policy could theoretically defer revenue recognition
beyond the
period in which we have earned the rights to such fees. However,
we
selected this accounting policy to counteract the possibility of
recognizing revenues from the NIH arrangement too early. For instance,
if
our policy permitted revenues to be recognized solely as qualifying
costs
were incurred, we could alter the amount of revenue recognized
by
incurring more or less cost in a given period, irrespective of
whether
these costs correlate to the research outputs generated. On the
other
hand, if revenue recognition were based on output measures alone,
it would
be possible to recognize revenue in excess of costs actually incurred;
this is not appropriate since qualifying costs remain the basis
of our
funding under the NIH grant. The application of our accounting
policy,
nonetheless, involves significant judgment, particularly in estimating
the
percentage of outputs realized to date versus the total outputs
expected
to be achieved under the grant
arrangement.
|
· |
Back-up
Supply Arrangement
|
We
agreed to serve as a back-up supplier of products in connection
with our
dispositions of specific Thin Film assets to MAST. Specifically,
we agreed
to supply Thin Film product to MAST at our cost for a defined period
of
time, which has since then expired. When we actually delivered
products
under the back-up supply arrangements in 2004, however, we recognized
revenues in the financial statements at the estimated selling price
which
we would receive in the marketplace. We used judgment, based on
historical
data and expectations about future market trends, in determining
the
estimated market selling price of products subject to the back-up
supply
arrangements. The amount of the deferred gain recognized as revenue
is
equal to the excess of the fair value of products sold, based on
historical selling prices of similar products, over our manufacturing
cost.
|
· |
Company
assets and liabilities, including goodwill, are allocated to each
reporting unit for purposes of completing the goodwill impairment
test.
|
· |
The
carrying value of each reporting unit - that is, the sum of all
of the net
assets allocated to the reporting unit - is then compared to its
fair
value.
|
· |
If
the fair value of the reporting unit is lower than its carrying
amount,
goodwill may be impaired - additional testing is required.
|
· |
The
asset will be employed in or the liability relates to the operations
of a
reporting unit.
|
· |
The
asset or liability will be considered in determining the fair value
of the
reporting unit.
|
· |
Provide
training to MAST personnel on production and other aspects of the
Thin
Film product lines, and
|
· |
Provide
a back-up supply of Thin Film products to MAST, at cost, for a
specified
period of time.
|
· |
Under
FIN 46R, an entity is a VIE if it has insufficient equity to finance
its
activities. We recognized that the initial cash contributed to
the Joint
Venture formed by Olympus and Cytori ($30,000,000) would be completely
utilized by the first quarter of 2006. Moreover, it was highly
unlikely
that the Joint Venture would be able to obtain the necessary financing
from third party lenders without additional subordinated financial
support
- such as personal guarantees by one or both of the Joint Venture
stockholders. Accordingly, the joint venture will require additional
financial support from Olympus and Cytori to finance its ongoing
operations, indicating that the Joint Venture is a VIE. In fact,
in the
first quarter of 2006, we contributed $150,000 each to fund the
Joint
Venture’s ongoing operations.
|
· |
Moreover,
Olympus has a contingent put option that would, in specified
circumstances, require Cytori to purchase Olympus’s interests in the Joint
Venture for a fixed amount of $22,000,000. Accordingly, Olympus
is
protected in some circumstances from absorbing all expected losses
in the
Joint Venture. Under FIN 46R, this means that Olympus may not be
an
“at-risk” equity holder, although Olympus clearly has decision rights over
the operations of the Joint Venture.
|
· |
The
business operations of the Joint Venture will be most closely aligned
to
those of Olympus (i.e., the manufacture of
devices).
|
· |
Olympus
controls the Board of Directors, as well as the day-to-day operations
of
the Joint Venture.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
||||||||||||||||
Item
1. Financial Statements
|
||||||||||||||||
/s/
KPMG LLP
|
|
San
Diego, California
|
|
March
29, 2007
|
As of December 31,
|
|||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Assets
|
|||||||
Current
assets:
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
8,902,000
|
$
|
8,007,000
|
|||
Short-term
investments, available-for-sale
|
3,976,000
|
7,838,000
|
|||||
Accounts
receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,000 and
$9,000 in
2006 and 2005, respectively
|
225,000
|
816,000
|
|||||
Inventories,
net
|
164,000
|
258,000
|
|||||
Other
current assets
|
711,000
|
621,000
|
|||||
Total
current assets
|
13,978,000
|
17,540,000
|
|||||
Property
and equipment held for sale, net
|
457,000
|
—
|
|||||
Property
and equipment, net
|
4,242,000
|
4,260,000
|
|||||
Investment
in joint venture
|
76,000
|
—
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
428,000
|
458,000
|
|||||
Intangibles,
net
|
1,300,000
|
1,521,000
|
|||||
Goodwill
|
4,387,000
|
4,387,000
|
|||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
24,868,000
|
$
|
28,166,000
|
|||
Liabilities
and Stockholders’ Deficit
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
|||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
$
|
5,587,000
|
$
|
6,129,000
|
|||
Current
portion of long-term obligations
|
999,000
|
952,000
|
|||||
Total
current liabilities
|
6,586,000
|
7,081,000
|
|||||
Deferred
revenues, related party
|
23,906,000
|
17,311,000
|
|||||
Deferred
revenues
|
2,389,000
|
2,541,000
|
|||||
Option
liabilities
|
900,000
|
5,331,000
|
|||||
Long-term
deferred rent
|
741,000
|
573,000
|
|||||
Long-term
obligations, less current portion
|
1,159,000
|
1,558,000
|
|||||
Total
liabilities
|
35,681,000
|
34,395,000
|
|||||
Commitments
and contingencies
|
|||||||
Stockholders’
deficit:
|
|||||||
Preferred
stock, $0.001 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; -0- shares
issued
and outstanding in 2006 and 2005
|
—
|
—
|
|||||
Common
stock, $0.001 par value; 95,000,000 shares authorized; 21,612,243
and
18,194,283 shares issued and 18,739,409 and 15,321,449 shares outstanding
in 2006 and 2005, respectively
|
22,000
|
18,000
|
|||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
103,053,000
|
82,196,000
|
|||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(103,460,000
|
)
|
(78,013,000
|
)
|
|||
Treasury
stock, at cost
|
(10,414,000
|
)
|
(10,414,000
|
)
|
|||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss)
|
1,000
|
(16,000
|
)
|
||||
Amount
due from exercises of stock options
|
(15,000
|
)
|
—
|
||||
Total
stockholders’ deficit
|
(10,813,000
|
)
|
(6,229,000
|
)
|
|||
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ deficit
|
$
|
24,868,000
|
$
|
28,166,000
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
||||||||
Product
revenues:
|
||||||||||
Sales
to related party
|
$
|
1,451,000
|
$
|
5,634,000
|
$
|
4,085,000
|
||||
Sales
to third parties
|
—
|
—
|
2,237,000
|
|||||||
1,451,000
|
5,634,000
|
6,322,000
|
||||||||
Cost
of product revenues
|
1,634,000
|
3,154,000
|
3,384,000
|
|||||||
Gross
profit (loss)
|
(183,000
|
)
|
2,480,000
|
2,938,000
|
||||||
Development
revenues:
|
||||||||||
Development,
related party
|
5,905,000
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||
Development
|
152,000
|
51,000
|
158,000
|
|||||||
Research
grants and other
|
419,000
|
320,000
|
338,000
|
|||||||
6,476,000
|
371,000
|
496,000
|
||||||||
Operating
expenses:
|
||||||||||
Research
and development
|
21,977,000
|
15,450,000
|
10,384,000
|
|||||||
Sales
and marketing
|
2,055,000
|
1,547,000
|
2,413,000
|
|||||||
General
and administrative
|
12,547,000
|
10,208,000
|
6,551,000
|
|||||||
Change
in fair value of option liabilities
|
(4,431,000
|
)
|
3,645,000
|
—
|
||||||
Restructuring
charge
|
—
|
—
|
107,000
|
|||||||
Equipment
impairment charge
|
—
|
—
|
42,000
|
|||||||
Total
operating expenses
|
32,148,000
|
30,850,000
|
19,497,000
|
|||||||
Operating
loss
|
(25,855,000
|
)
|
(27,999,000
|
)
|
(16,063,000
|
)
|
||||
Other
income (expense):
|
||||||||||
Gain
on sale of assets
|
—
|
5,526,000
|
—
|
|||||||
Gain
on sale of assets, related party
|
—
|
—
|
13,883,000
|
|||||||
Interest
income
|
708,000
|
299,000
|
252,000
|
|||||||
Interest
expense
|
(199,000
|
)
|
(137,000
|
)
|
(177,000
|
)
|
||||
Other
income (expense), net
|
(27,000
|
)
|
(55,000
|
)
|
15,000
|
|||||
Equity
loss from investment in joint venture
|
(74,000
|
)
|
(4,172,000
|
)
|
—
|
|||||
Total
other income, net
|
408,000
|
1,461,000
|
13,973,000
|
|||||||
Net
loss
|
(25,447,000
|
)
|
(26,538,000
|
)
|
(2,090,000
|
)
|
||||
Other
comprehensive income (loss) - unrealized holding income
(loss)
|
17,000
|
16,000
|
(58,000
|
)
|
||||||
Comprehensive
loss
|
$
|
(25,430,000
|
)
|
$
|
(26,522,000
|
)
|
$
|
(2,148,000
|
)
|
|
Basic
and diluted net loss per common share
|
$
|
(1.53
|
)
|
$
|
(1.80
|
)
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
Basic
and diluted weighted average common shares
|
16,603,550
|
14,704,281
|
13,932,390
|
Accumulated
|
Amount
due
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional
|
Treasury
|
Other
|
From
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common
Stock
|
Paid-in
|
Unearned
|
Accumulated
|
Treasury
Stock
|
Stock
|
Comprehensive
|
Exercises
of
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Compensation
|
Deficit
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Receivable
|
Income
(Loss)
|
Stock
Options
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2003
|
16,777,644
|
$
17,000
|
$
74,698,000
|
$
(109,000)
|
$
(49,385,000)
|
2,582,582
|
$(9,362,000)
|
$
(976,000)
|
$
26,000
|
—
|
$14,909,000
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock under stock option plan
|
42,374
|
—
|
29,000
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
29,000
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Compensatory
stock options
|
—
|
—
|
10,000
|
109,000
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
119,000
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase
of treasury stock
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
27,650
|
(76,000)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(76,000)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury
stock receivable
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
262,602
|
(976,000
|
)
|
976,000
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
loss on investments
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(58,000
|
)
|
—
|
(58,000
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Net
loss for the year ended December 31, 2004
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(2,090,000
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(2,090,000
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2004
|
16,820,018
|
17,000
|
74,737,000
|
—
|
(51,475,000
|
)
|
2,872,834
|
(10,414,000
|
)
|
—
|
(32,000
|
)
|
—
|
12,833,000
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock under stock option plan
|
232,042
|
—
|
174,000
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
174,000
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock under stock warrant agreement
|
22,223
|
—
|
50,000
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
50,000
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Compensatory
stock options
|
—
|
—
|
341,000
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
341,000
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Compensatory
common stock awards
|
20,000
|
—
|
63,000
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
63,000
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock to Olympus
|
1,100,000
|
1,000
|
3,002,000
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
3,003,000
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Accretion
of interests in joint venture
|
—
|
—
|
3,829,000
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
3,829,000
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
gain on investments
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
16,000
|
—
|
16,000
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
loss for the year ended December 31, 2005
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(26,538,000
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(26,538,000
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2005
|
18,194,283
|
18,000
|
82,196,000
|
—
|
(78,013,000
|
)
|
2,872,834
|
(10,414,000
|
)
|
—
|
(16,000
|
)
|
—
|
(6,229,000
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
—
|
—
|
3,202,000
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
3,202,000
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock under stock option plan
|
397,205
|
1,000
|
934,000
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
935,000
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Compensatory
common stock awards
|
2,500
|
—
|
18,000
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
18,000
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock
|
2,918,255
|
3,000
|
16,216,000
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
16,219,000
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
issued for license amendment
|
100,000
|
—
|
487,000
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
487,000
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount
due from exercises of stock options
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(15,000
|
)
|
(15,000
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
gain on investments
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
17,000
|
—
|
17,000
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
loss for the year ended December 31, 2006
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(25,447,000
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(25,447,000
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2006
|
21,612,243
|
$
|
22,000
|
$
|
103,053,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
(103,460,000
|
)
|
2,872,834
|
$
|
(10,414,000
|
)
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
1,000
|
$
|
(15,000
|
)
|
$
|
(10,813,000
|
)
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
||||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(25,447,000
|
)
|
$
|
(26,538,000
|
)
|
$
|
(2,090,000
|
)
|
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
2,120,000
|
1,724,000
|
1,752,000
|
|||||||
Inventory
provision
|
88,000
|
280,000
|
242,000
|
|||||||
Warranty
provision (reversal)
|
(23,000
|
)
|
53,000
|
86,000
|
||||||
(Reduction)
increase in allowance for doubtful accounts
|
(7,000
|
)
|
1,000
|
(44,000
|
)
|
|||||
Change
in fair value of option liabilities
|
(4,431,000
|
)
|
3,645,000
|
—
|
||||||
Loss
on disposal of assets
|
—
|
—
|
3,000
|
|||||||
Equipment
impairment charge
|
—
|
—
|
42,000
|
|||||||
Restructuring
charge
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||
Amortization
of gain on sale of assets
|
—
|
—
|
(772,000
|
)
|
||||||
Amortization
of gain on sale of assets, related party
|
—
|
—
|
(156,000
|
)
|
||||||
Gain
on sale of assets
|
—
|
(5,526,000
|
)
|
—
|
||||||
Gain
on sale of assets, related party
|
—
|
—
|
(13,883,000
|
)
|
||||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
3,220,000
|
404,000
|
119,000
|
|||||||
Stock
issued for license amendment
|
487,000
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||
Equity
loss from investment in joint venture
|
74,000
|
4,172,000
|
—
|
|||||||
Increases
(decreases) in cash caused by changes in operating assets and
liabilities:
|
||||||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
598,000
|
46,000
|
472,000
|
|||||||
Inventories
|
6,000
|
(159,000
|
)
|
33,000
|
||||||
Other
current assets
|
(90,000
|
)
|
363,000
|
(458,000
|
)
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
30,000
|
(346,000
|
)
|
8,000
|
||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
281,000
|
|
3,027,000
|
(527,000
|
)
|
|||||
Deferred
revenues, related party
|
6,595,000
|
17,311,000
|
—
|
|||||||
Deferred
revenues
|
(152,000
|
)
|
(51,000
|
)
|
2,592,000
|
|||||
Long-term
deferred rent
|
168,000
|
493,000
|
7,000
|
|||||||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(16,483,000
|
)
|
(1,101,000
|
)
|
(12,574,000
|
)
|
||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||||
Proceeds
from the sale and maturity of short-term investments
|
67,137,000
|
56,819,000
|
51,132,000
|
|||||||
Purchases
of short-term investments
|
(63,258,000
|
)
|
(54,062,000
|
)
|
(50,321,000
|
)
|
||||
Proceeds
from the sale of assets, net
|
—
|
—
|
6,931,000
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from sale of assets, related party
|
—
|
—
|
6,500,000
|
|||||||
Purchases
of property and equipment
|
(3,138,000
|
)
|
(1,846,000
|
)
|
(789,000
|
)
|
||||
Investment
in joint venture
|
(150,000
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Acquisition
costs
|
—
|
—
|
(28,000
|
)
|
||||||
Net
cash provided by investing activities
|
591,000
|
911,000
|
13,425,000
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||||
Principal
payments on long-term obligations
|
(952,000
|
)
|
(936,000
|
)
|
(847,000
|
)
|
||||
Proceeds
from long-term obligations
|
600,000
|
1,380,000
|
1,039,000
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from exercise of employee stock options and warrants
|
920,000
|
224,000
|
29,000
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from sale of common stock
|
16,219,000
|
3,003,000
|
—
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from issuance of options, related party
|
—
|
1,686,000
|
—
|
|||||||
Purchase
of treasury stock
|
—
|
—
|
(1,052,000
|
)
|
||||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
16,787,000
|
5,357,000
|
(831,000
|
)
|
||||||
Net
increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
895,000
|
5,167,000
|
20,000
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
8,007,000
|
2,840,000
|
2,820,000
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of year
|
$
|
8,902,000
|
$
|
8,007,000
|
$
|
2,840,000
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
||||||||
Supplemental
disclosure of cash flows information:
|
||||||||||
Cash
paid during period for:
|
||||||||||
Interest
|
$
|
201,000
|
$
|
135,000
|
$
|
176,000
|
||||
Taxes
|
1,000
|
13,000
|
7,000
|
|||||||
Supplemental
schedule of non-cash investing and financing
activities:
|
||||||||||
Transfer
of intangible assets to joint venture (note 4)
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
343,000
|
$
|
—
|
||||
Accretion
of interest in joint venture (note 4)
|
—
|
3,829,000
|
—
|
|||||||
Additions
to leasehold improvements included in accounts payable and accrued
expenses
|
—
|
800,000
|
—
|
|||||||
Amount
due from exercise of stock options
|
15,000
|
—
|
—
|
December 31, 2006
|
||||||||||
Regenerative
Cell Technology
|
MacroPore
Biosurgery
|
Total
|
||||||||
Other
intangibles, net:
|
||||||||||
Beginning
balance
|
$
|
1,521,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
1,521,000
|
||||
Amortization
|
(221,000
|
)
|
—
|
(221,000
|
)
|
|||||
Ending
balance
|
1,300,000
|
—
|
1,300,000
|
|||||||
Goodwill,
net:
|
||||||||||
Beginning
balance
|
3,922,000
|
465,000
|
4,387,000
|
|||||||
Disposal
of assets
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||
Ending
balance
|
3,922,000
|
465,000
|
4,387,000
|
|||||||
Total
goodwill and other intangibles, net
|
$
|
5,222,000
|
$
|
465,000
|
$
|
5,687,000
|
||||
Cumulative
amount of amortization charged against intangible assets
|
$
|
916,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
916,000
|
December 31, 2005
|
||||||||||
Regenerative
Cell Technology
|
MacroPore
Biosurgery
|
Total
|
||||||||
Other
intangibles, net:
|
||||||||||
Beginning
balance
|
$
|
2,122,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
2,122,000
|
||||
Amortization
|
(258,000
|
)
|
—
|
(258,000
|
)
|
|||||
Subtotal
|
1,864,000
|
—
|
1,864,000
|
|||||||
Patents
and core technology transferred to Joint Venture (note 4)
|
(479,000
|
)
|
—
|
(479,000
|
)
|
|||||
Accumulated
amortization related to above
|
136,000
|
—
|
136,000
|
|||||||
Patents
and core technology transferred to Joint Venture, net
|
(343,000
|
)
|
—
|
(343,000
|
)
|
|||||
Ending
balance
|
1,521,000
|
—
|
1,521,000
|
|||||||
Goodwill,
net:
|
||||||||||
Beginning
balance
|
3,922,000
|
465,000
|
4,387,000
|
|||||||
Disposal
of assets
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||
Ending
balance
|
3,922,000
|
465,000
|
4,387,000
|
|||||||
Total
goodwill and other intangibles, net
|
$
|
5,443,000
|
$
|
465,000
|
$
|
5,908,000
|
||||
Cumulative
amount of amortization charged against intangible assets
|
$
|
695,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
695,000
|
2007
|
221,000
|
|||
2008
|
221,000
|
|||
2009
|
221,000
|
|||
2010
|
221,000
|
|||
Thereafter
|
416,000
|
|||
$
|
1,300,000
|
· |
In
2004, we received a nonrefundable payment of $1,250,000 from Senko
after
filing an initial regulatory application with the Japanese Ministry
of
Health, Labour and Welfare (“MHLW”) related to the Thin Film product line.
We initially recorded this payment as deferred revenues of
$1,250,000.
|
· |
Upon
the achievement of commercialization (i.e., regulatory approval
by the
MHLW), we will be entitled to an additional nonrefundable payment
of
$250,000.
|
· |
Qualifying
costs incurred (and not previously recognized) to date, plus
any allowable
grant fees for which we are entitled to funding from the NIH;
or
|
· |
The
outputs generated to date versus the total outputs expected
to be achieved
under the research arrangement.
|
As of
January 1,
|
Additions/
(Deductions) to
expenses
|
Claims
|
As of
December 31,
|
||||||||||
2006:
|
|||||||||||||
Warranty
reserve
|
$
|
155,000
|
$
|
(23,000
|
)
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
132,000
|
||||
2005:
|
|||||||||||||
Warranty
reserve
|
$
|
102,000
|
$
|
53,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
155,000
|
For
the year ended December 31, 2005
|
For
the year ended December 31, 2004
|
||||||
Expected
term
|
8
years
|
6
years
|
|||||
Risk
free interest rate
|
3.9-4.4
|
%
|
3.3-4.4
|
%
|
|||
Volatility
|
80
|
%
|
85
|
%
|
|||
Dividends
|
—
|
—
|
|||||
Resulting
weighted average grant date fair value
|
$
|
3.25
|
$
|
3.26
|
For
the year ended December 31, 2005
|
For
the year ended December 31, 2004
|
||||||
Net
loss:
|
|||||||
As
reported
|
$
|
(26,538,000
|
)
|
$
|
(2,090,000
|
)
|
|
Add:
Employee stock-based compensation expense included in reported
net loss,
net of related tax effects
|
341,000
|
96,000
|
|||||
Deduct:
Total employee stock-based compensation expense determined under
the fair
value method for all awards, net of related tax effects
|
(2,675,000
|
)
|
(2,586,000
|
)
|
|||
Pro
forma
|
$
|
(28,872,000
|
)
|
$
|
(4,580,000
|
)
|
|
Basic
and diluted loss per common share:
|
|||||||
As
reported
|
$
|
(1.80
|
)
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
Pro
forma
|
$
|
(1.96
|
)
|
$
|
(0.33
|
)
|
Year ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
||||||||
Revenues:
|
||||||||||
Regenerative
cell technology
|
$
|
6,324,000
|
$
|
320,000
|
$
|
338,000
|
||||
MacroPore
Biosurgery
|
1,603,000
|
5,685,000
|
6,480,000
|
|||||||
Total
revenues
|
$
|
7,927,000
|
$
|
6,005,000
|
$
|
6,818,000
|
||||
Segment
losses:
|
||||||||||
Regenerative
cell technology
|
$
|
(16,211,000
|
)
|
$
|
(13,170,000
|
)
|
$
|
(6,911,000
|
)
|
|
MacroPore
Biosurgery
|
(1,528,000
|
)
|
(976,000
|
)
|
(2,452,000
|
|||||
General
and administrative expenses
|
(12,547,000
|
)
|
(10,208,000
|
)
|
(6,551,000
|
)
|
||||
Changes
in fair value of option liabilities
|
4,431,000
|
(3,645,000
|
)
|
—
|
||||||
Restructuring
charge
|
—
|
—
|
(107,000
|
)
|
||||||
Equipment
impairment charge
|
—
|
—
|
(42,000
|
)
|
||||||
Total
operating loss
|
$
|
(25,855,000
|
)
|
$
|
(27,999,000
|
)
|
$
|
(16,063,000
|
)
|
As of December 31,
|
|||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Assets:
|
|||||||
Regenerative
cell technology
|
$
|
9,792,000
|
$
|
9,152,000
|
|||
MacroPore
Biosurgery
|
1,758,000
|
2,206,000
|
|||||
Corporate
assets
|
13,318,000
|
16,808,000
|
|||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
24,868,000
|
$
|
28,166,000
|
Years ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
||||||||
Regenerative
cell technology:
|
||||||||||
Development
revenues:
|
||||||||||
Milestone
revenue (Olympus)
|
$
|
5,905,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
||||
Research
grant (NIH)
|
310,000
|
312,000
|
328,000
|
|||||||
Regenerative
cell storage services
|
7,000
|
8,000
|
10,000
|
|||||||
Other
|
102,000
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||
Total
regenerative cell technology
|
6,324,000
|
320,000
|
338,000
|
|||||||
MacroPore
Biosurgery:
|
||||||||||
Product
revenues:
|
||||||||||
Spine
& orthopedics products
|
1,451,000
|
5,634,000
|
3,803,000
|
|||||||
Thin
Film products:
|
||||||||||
Product
sales (non-MAST-related)
|
—
|
—
|
559,000
|
|||||||
Product
sales to MAST
|
—
|
—
|
906,000
|
|||||||
Amortization
of gain on sale (MAST)
|
—
|
—
|
772,000
|
|||||||
—
|
—
|
2,237,000
|
||||||||
Craniomaxillofacial
(CMF) products:
|
||||||||||
Product
sales
|
—
|
—
|
126,000
|
|||||||
Amortization
of gain on sale
|
—
|
—
|
156,000
|
|||||||
—
|
—
|
282,000
|
||||||||
Development
revenues
|
152,000
|
51,000
|
158,000
|
|||||||
Total
MacroPore Biosurgery
|
1,603,000
|
5,685,000
|
6,480,000
|
|||||||
Total
revenues
|
$
|
7,927,000
|
$
|
6,005,000
|
$
|
6,818,000
|
For the Years Ended
December 31,
|
U.S. Revenues
|
Non-U.S. Revenues
|
Total Revenues
|
|||||||
2006
|
$
|
7,827,000
|
$
|
100,000
|
$
|
7,927,000
|
||||
2005
|
$
|
6,005,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
6,005,000
|
||||
2004
|
$
|
6,602,000
|
$
|
216,000
|
$
|
6,818,000
|
As of
December 31,
|
U.S. Domiciled
|
Non-U.S. Domiciled
|
Total
|
|||||||
2006
|
$
|
4,995,000
|
$
|
208,000
|
$
|
5,203,000
|
||||
2005
|
$
|
4,539,000
|
$
|
179,000
|
$
|
4,718,000
|
· |
Contractual
term of 1.67 years,
|
· |
Risk-free
interest rate of 3.46%, and
|
· |
Estimated
share-price volatility of 59.7%
|
· |
Contractual
term of 0 years and 1 year,
|
· |
Risk-free
interest rate of 0% and 4.38%, and
|
· |
Estimated
share-price volatility of 0% and 65.1%,
respectively.
|
· |
Olympus
paid $30,000,000 for its 50% interest in the Joint Venture. Moreover,
Olympus simultaneously entered into a License/Joint Development
Agreement
with the Joint Venture and us to develop a second generation commercial
system and manufacturing capabilities.
|
· |
We
licensed our device technology, including the Celution™ System and certain
related intellectual property, to the Joint Venture for use in
future
generation devices. These devices will process and purify adult
stem and
regenerative cells residing in adipose (fat) tissue for various
therapeutic clinical applications. In exchange for this license,
we
received a 50% interest in the Joint Venture, as well as an initial
$11,000,000 payment from the Joint Venture; the source of this
payment was
the $30,000,000 contributed to the Joint Venture by Olympus. Moreover,
upon receipt of a CE mark for the first generation Celution™ System in
January 2006, we received an additional $11,000,000 development
milestone
payment from the Joint Venture.
|
December
31, 2006
|
December
31, 2005
|
November
4, 2005
|
||||||||
Expected
volatility of Cytori
|
66.00
|
%
|
63.20
|
%
|
63.20
|
%
|
||||
Expected
volatility of the Joint Venture
|
56.60
|
%
|
69.10
|
%
|
69.10
|
%
|
||||
Bankruptcy
recovery rate for Cytori
|
21.00
|
%
|
21.00
|
%
|
21.00
|
%
|
||||
Bankruptcy
threshold for Cytori
|
$
|
10,110,000
|
$
|
10,780,000
|
$
|
10,780,000
|
||||
Probability
of a change of control event for Cytori
|
1.94
|
%
|
3.04
|
%
|
3.04
|
%
|
||||
Expected
correlation between fair values of Cytori and the Joint Venture
in the
future
|
99.00
|
%
|
99.00
|
%
|
99.00
|
%
|
||||
Risk
free interest rate
|
4.71
|
%
|
4.39
|
%
|
4.66
|
%
|
As
of December 31, 2006
|
As
of December 31, 2005
|
||||||
Balance
Sheet
|
|||||||
Assets:
|
|||||||
Cash
|
$
|
173,000
|
$
|
11,000,000
|
|||
Prepaid
insurance
|
15,000
|
—
|
|||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
188,000
|
$
|
11,000,000
|
|||
Liabilities
and Stockholders’ Equity:
|
|||||||
Accrued
expenses
|
$
|
62,000
|
$
|
—
|
|||
Stockholders’
equity
|
126,000
|
11,000,000
|
|||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$
|
188,000
|
$
|
11,000,000
|
Period
from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006
|
Period
from November 4, 2005 (inception) to December 31,
2005
|
||||||
Statement
of Operation
|
|||||||
Research
and development expense
|
$
|
11,000,000
|
$
|
19,343,000
|
|||
General
and administrative expense
|
174,000
|
—
|
|||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(11,174,000
|
)
|
$
|
(19,343,000
|
)
|
· |
Finished
goods inventory of $177,000,
|
· |
Manufacturing
and development equipment of $217,000, and
|
· |
Goodwill
of $240,000.
|
· |
$200,000,
payable only upon receipt of 510(k) clearance from the U.S. Food
and Drug
Administration (“FDA”) for a hernia wrap product (thin film combined
product); and
|
· |
$2,000,000
on or before the earlier of (i) May 31, 2005, known as the “Settlement
Date,” or (ii) 15 days after the date upon which MAST has hired a Chief
Executive Officer (“CEO”), provided the CEO held that position for at
least four months and met other requirements specified in the sale
agreement. Note that clause (ii) effectively means that we would
not have
received payment of $2,000,000 before May 31, 2005 unless MAST
had hired a
CEO on or before January 31, 2005 (four months prior to the Settlement
Date). Moreover, in the event that MAST had not hired a CEO on
or before
January 31, 2005, MAST may have (at its sole option and subject
to the
requirements of the sale agreement) alternatively provided us with
a 19%
equity interest in the MAST business that is managing the Thin
Film assets
at May 31, 2005 in lieu of making the $2,000,000 payment. Our contention
was that MAST did in fact hire a CEO on or before January 31, 2005,
and
thus, we were entitled to a $2,000,000 cash payment on or before
May 31,
2005.
|
· |
Anti-adhesion,
|
· |
Soft
tissue support, and
|
· |
Minimization
of the attachment of soft tissues throughout the body.
|
· |
From
May 31, 2005 to May 31, 2007, the exercise price of the Purchase
Right
will be equal to the fair market value of the Japanese business,
but in no
event will be less than $3,000,000.
|
· |
Moreover,
between May 31, 2005 and May 31, 2007, MAST will have a right of
first
refusal to match the terms of any outside offer to buy our Japanese
Thin
Film business.
|
December 31, 2006
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Less than 12 months
temporary impairment
|
Greater than 12 months
temporary impairment
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Amortized
Cost
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
||||||||||||||||
Corporate
notes and bonds
|
$
|
599,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
599,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
599,000
|
||||||||
Agency
securities
|
3,377,000
|
—
|
3,377,000
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
3,377,000
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
|
$
|
3,976,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
3,976,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
3,976,000
|
December 31, 2005
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Less than 12 months
temporary impairment
|
Greater than 12 months
temporary impairment
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Amortized
Cost
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
||||||||||||||||
Corporate
notes and bonds
|
$
|
1,984,000
|
$
|
(2,000
|
)
|
$
|
1,882,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
100,000
|
$
|
(2,000
|
)
|
$
|
1,982,000
|
||||||
Agency
securities
|
5,870,000
|
(14,000
|
)
|
5,456,000
|
—
|
400,000
|
(14,000
|
)
|
5,856,000
|
|||||||||||||
Total
|
$
|
7,854,000
|
$
|
(16,000
|
)
|
$
|
7,338,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
500,000
|
$
|
(16,000
|
)
|
$
|
7,838,000
|
December 31, 2006
|
December 31, 2005
|
||||||||||||
Amortized
Cost
|
Estimated
Fair
Value
|
Amortized
Cost
|
Estimated
Fair
Value
|
||||||||||
Corporate
notes and bonds:
|
|||||||||||||
with
maturity of less than 1 year
|
$
|
599,000
|
$ |
599,000
|
$
|
1,984,000
|
$
|
1,982,000
|
|||||
with
maturity of 1 to 2 years
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||
Agency
securities:
|
|||||||||||||
with
maturity of less than 1 year
|
3,377,000
|
3,377,000
|
5,870,000
|
5,856,000
|
|||||||||
with
maturity of 1 to 2 years
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||
$
|
3,976,000
|
$
|
3,976,000
|
$
|
7,854,000
|
$
|
7,838,000
|
December
31,
|
December
31,
|
||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Raw
materials
|
$
|
136,000
|
$
|
232,000
|
|||
Finished
goods
|
28,000
|
26,000
|
|||||
$
|
164,000
|
$
|
258,000
|
December
31,
|
December
31,
|
||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Prepaid
expenses
|
$
|
648,000
|
$
|
506,000
|
|||
Accrued
interest receivable
|
19,000
|
77,000
|
|||||
Other
receivables
|
44,000
|
38,000
|
|||||
$
|
711,000
|
$
|
621,000
|
December
31,
|
December
31,
|
||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Manufacturing
and development equipment
|
$
|
2,980,000
|
$
|
4,681,000
|
|||
Office
and computer equipment
|
2,653,000
|
2,682,000
|
|||||
Leasehold
improvements
|
3,085,000
|
3,359,000
|
|||||
8,718,000
|
10,722,000
|
||||||
Less
accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
(4,476,000
|
)
|
(6,462,000
|
)
|
|||
$
|
4,242,000
|
$
|
4,260,000
|
December
31,
|
December
31,
|
||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Accrued
legal fees
|
$
|
1,630,000
|
$
|
975,000
|
|||
Accrued
studies
|
1,064,000
|
712,000
|
|||||
Accounts
payable
|
729,000
|
933,000
|
|||||
Accrued
vacation
|
628,000
|
680,000
|
|||||
Accrued
bonus
|
661,000
|
1,018,000
|
|||||
Accrued
expenses
|
371,000
|
467,000
|
|||||
Deferred
rent
|
239,000
|
138,000
|
|||||
Warranty
reserve (note 2)
|
132,000
|
155,000
|
|||||
Accrued
accounting fees
|
115,000
|
199,000
|
|||||
Accrued
payroll
|
18,000
|
52,000
|
|||||
Accrued
leasehold improvements
|
—
|
800,000
|
|||||
$
|
5,587,000
|
$
|
6,129,000
|
Years
Ending December 31,
|
Operating
Leases
|
|||
2007
|
$
|
1,677,000
|
||
2008
|
1,342,000
|
|||
2009
|
1,382,000
|
|||
2010
|
707,000
|
|||
Total
|
$
|
5,108,000
|
· |
16,000
additional square feet for research and development activities
located at
6749 Top Gun Street, San Diego, California that has been amended
to
terminate on April 30, 2007.
|
· |
4,027
square feet of office space located at 9-3 Otsuka 2-chome, Bunkyo-ku,
Tokyo, Japan. The agreement bears rent at a rate of $3.66 per square
foot,
for a term of two years expiring on November 30,
2007.
|
As
of January 1,
|
Charged to
Expense*
|
Costs Paid
|
Adjustments
to
Liability**
|
As of
December 31,
|
||||||||||||
2004:
|
||||||||||||||||
Lease
termination
|
$
|
153,000
|
$
|
107,000
|
$
|
(255,000
|
)
|
$
|
(5,000
|
)
|
$
|
—
|
Origination Date
|
Interest Rate
|
Current
Monthly
Payment*
|
Term
|
Remaining
Principal
|
|||||||||
October
2003
|
8.6
|
%
|
6,000
|
48
Months
|
$
|
54,000
|
|||||||
October
2003
|
8.8
|
%
|
12,000
|
48
Months
|
122,000
|
||||||||
March
2004
|
8.2
|
%
|
16,000
|
48
Months
|
166,000
|
||||||||
April
2004
|
9.0
|
%
|
3,000
|
48
Months
|
44,000
|
||||||||
September
2004
|
9.0
|
%
|
9,000
|
48
Months
|
130,000
|
||||||||
December
2005
|
10.75
|
%
|
42,000
|
35
Months
|
1,042,000
|
||||||||
December
2006
|
11.05
|
%
|
20,000
|
36
Months
|
600,000
|
||||||||
$
|
2,158,000
|
Years Ending December 31,
|
||||
2007
|
$
|
999,000
|
||
2008
|
741,000
|
|||
2009
|
399,000
|
|||
2010
|
19,000
|
|||
Total
|
$
|
2,158,000
|
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
||||||||
Income
tax expense (benefit) at federal statutory rate
|
(34.00
|
)%
|
(34.00
|
)%
|
(34.00
|
)%
|
||||
Stock
based compensation
|
0.99
|
%
|
0.05
|
%
|
1.54
|
%
|
||||
Credits
|
(2.72
|
)%
|
(0.59
|
)%
|
(3.58
|
)%
|
||||
Change
in federal valuation allowance
|
34.52
|
%
|
23.46
|
%
|
31.05
|
%
|
||||
Equity
loss on investment in Joint Venture
|
0.12
|
%
|
5.35
|
—
|
||||||
Gain
on intangible property
|
—
|
%
|
4.74
|
—
|
||||||
Other,
net
|
1.09
|
%
|
0.99
|
%
|
4.99
|
%
|
||||
0.00
|
%
|
0.00
|
%
|
0.00
|
%
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Deferred
tax assets:
|
|||||||
Allowances
and reserves
|
$
|
163,000
|
$
|
190,000
|
|||
Accrued
expenses
|
625,000
|
275,000
|
|||||
Deferred
revenue and gain on sale of assets
|
7,971,000
|
5,784,000
|
|||||
Stock
based compensation
|
1,933,000
|
1,604,000
|
|||||
Net
operating loss carryforwards
|
24,410,000
|
17,917,000
|
|||||
Income
tax credit carryforwards
|
3,201,000
|
2,195,000
|
|||||
Capitalized
assets and other
|
720,000
|
435,000
|
|||||
39,023,000
|
28,400,000
|
||||||
Valuation
allowance
|
(38,505,000
|
)
|
(27,830,000
|
)
|
|||
Total
deferred tax assets, net of allowance
|
518,000
|
570,000
|
|||||
Deferred
tax liabilities:
|
|||||||
Property
and equipment, principally due to differences in
depreciation
|
—
|
174,000
|
|||||
Intangibles
|
(518,000
|
)
|
(738,000
|
)
|
|||
Other
|
—
|
(6,000
|
)
|
||||
Total
deferred tax liability
|
(518,000
|
)
|
(570,000
|
)
|
|||
Net
deferred tax assets (liability)
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
· |
25%
of a granted award will vest after one year of service, while
an
additional 1/48 of the award will vest at the end of each month
thereafter
for 36 months, or
|
· |
1/48
of the award will vest at the end of each month over a four-year
period.
|
Options
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price
|
||||||
Balance
as of January 1, 2006
|
5,784,741
|
$
|
4.12
|
||||
Granted
|
904,850
|
$
|
7.16
|
||||
Exercised
|
(397,205
|
)
|
$
|
2.36
|
|||
Expired
|
(46,572
|
)
|
$
|
6.53
|
|||
Cancelled/forfeited
|
(311,785
|
)
|
$
|
5.31
|
|||
Balance
as of December 31, 2006
|
5,934,029
|
$
|
4.62
|
Options
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price
|
Weighted
Average Remaining Contractual Term (years)
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
|
||||||||||
Balance
as of December 31, 2006
|
5,934,029
|
$
|
4.62
|
5.6
|
$
|
13,079,826
|
|||||||
Vested
and unvested expected to vest at December 31, 2006
|
5,845,484
|
$
|
4.47
|
5.6
|
$
|
12,982,379
|
|||||||
Vested
and exercisable at December 31, 2006
|
4,381,603
|
$
|
4.27
|
4.5
|
$
|
10,991,014
|
Range of Exercise Price
|
Options
Outstanding
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
in Years
|
Options
Vested
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|||||||||||
Less
than $2.00
|
291,408
|
$
|
0.29
|
1.9
|
291,408
|
$
|
0.29
|
|||||||||
$
2.00 - 3.99
|
2,036,539
|
$
|
3.07
|
4.9
|
1,676,139
|
$
|
3.07
|
|||||||||
$
4.00 - 5.99
|
1,819,386
|
$
|
4.32
|
5.9
|
1,466,498
|
$
|
4.29
|
|||||||||
$
6.00 - 7.99
|
1,450,196
|
$
|
6.87
|
6.3
|
814,080
|
$
|
6.97
|
|||||||||
$
8.00 - 9.99
|
259,500
|
$
|
8.68
|
8.9
|
56,478
|
$
|
8.65
|
|||||||||
More
than $10.00
|
77,000
|
$
|
13.18
|
3.7
|
77,000
|
$
|
13.18
|
|||||||||
5,934,029
|
4,381,603
|
Expected
term
|
6
years
|
|||
Risk-free
interest rate
|
4.50
|
%
|
||
Volatility
|
78.61
|
%
|
||
Dividends
|
—
|
|||
Resulting
weighted average grant date fair value
|
$
|
5.26
|
For
the years ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
||||||||
Total
compensation cost for share-based payment arrangements recognized
in the
statement of operations (net of tax of $0)
|
$
|
3,220,000
|
$
|
404,000
|
$
|
128,000
|
||||
Total
compensation cost capitalized as part of the cost of an asset
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
For the three months ended
|
|||||||||||||
March 31,
2006
|
June 30,
2006
|
September 30,
2006
|
December 31,
2006
|
||||||||||
Product
revenues
|
$
|
502,000
|
$
|
453,000
|
$
|
133,000
|
$
|
363,000
|
|||||
Gross
profit (loss)
|
48,000
|
(51,000
|
)
|
(250,000
|
)
|
70,000
|
|||||||
Development
revenues
|
830,000
|
63,000
|
351,000
|
5,232,000
|
|||||||||
Operating
expenses
|
8,418,000
|
7,437,000
|
8,969,000
|
7,324,000
|
|||||||||
Other
income
|
84,000
|
112,000
|
101,000
|
111,000
|
|||||||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(7,456,000
|
)
|
$
|
(7,313,000
|
)
|
$
|
(8,767,000
|
)
|
$
|
(1,911,000
|
)
|
|
Basic
and diluted net loss per share
|
$
|
(0.48
|
)
|
$
|
(0.47
|
)
|
$
|
(0.53
|
)
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
For the three months ended
|
|||||||||||||
March 31,
2005
|
June 30,
2005
|
September 30,
2005
|
December 31,
2005
|
||||||||||
Product
revenues
|
$
|
1,755,000
|
$
|
1,477,000
|
$
|
1,544,000
|
$
|
858,000
|
|||||
Gross
profit
|
1,010,000
|
739,000
|
616,000
|
115,000
|
|||||||||
Development
revenues
|
34,000
|
64,000
|
38,000
|
235,000
|
|||||||||
Operating
expenses
|
5,573,000
|
6,154,000
|
8,523,000
|
10,600,000
|
|||||||||
Other
income (loss)
|
2,000
|
(8,000
|
)
|
5,581,000
|
(4,114,000
|
)
|
|||||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(4,527,000
|
)
|
$
|
(5,359,000
|
)
|
$
|
(2,288,000
|
)
|
$
|
(14,364,000
|
)
|
|
Basic
and diluted net loss per share
|
$
|
(0.32
|
)
|
$
|
(0.37
|
)
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
$
|
(0.96
|
)
|
21. |
Subsequent
Events
|
(a)
(1)
|
Financial
Statements
|
||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Balance at
beginning of
year
|
Additions/(Reductions)
((charges)/ credits to
expense)
|
Charged to
Other
Accounts
|
Deductions
|
Balance at
end of year
|
||||||||||||
Allowance
for doubtful accounts:
|
||||||||||||||||
Year
ended December 31, 2006
|
$
|
9
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
$
|
2
|
|||||
Year
ended December 31, 2005
|
$
|
8
|
$
|
1
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
9
|
||||||
Year
ended December 31, 2004
|
$
|
62
|
$
|
(44
|
)
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
$
|
8
|
Exhibit
Number
|
Description
|
|
3.1
|
Amended
and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
(filed as Exhibit 3.1 to our Form 10-Q Quarterly Report as
filed on August 13, 2002 and incorporated by reference herein)
|
|
3.2
|
Amended
and Restated Bylaws of Cytori Therapeutics, Inc. (filed
as Exhibit 3.2 to our Form 10-Q Quarterly Report, as filed on
August 14, 2003 and incorporated by reference herein)
|
|
3.3
|
Certificate
of Ownership and Merger (effecting name change to
Cytori Therapeutics, Inc.) (filed as Exhibit 3.1.1 to our Form
10-Q, as
filed on November 14, 2005 and incorporated by reference
herein)
|
|
4.1
|
Rights
Agreement, dated as of May 19, 2003, between Cytori
Therapeutics, Inc. and Computershare Trust Company, Inc. as Rights
Agent,
which includes: as Exhibit A thereto, the Form of Certificate of
Designation, Preferences and Rights of Series RP Preferred Stock
of Cytori
Therapeutics, Inc.; as Exhibit B thereto, the Form of Right Certificate;
and, as Exhibit C thereto, the Summary of Rights to Purchase Series
RP
Preferred Stock (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to our Form 8-A which was
filed on
May 30, 2003 and incorporated by reference herein)
|
|
4.2
|
Amendment
No. 1 to Rights Agreement dated as of May 12, 2005,
between Cytori Therapeutics, Inc. and Computershare Trust Company,
Inc. as
Rights Agent (filed as Exhibit 4.1.1 to our Form 8-K, which was
filed on
May 18, 2005 and incorporated by reference herein).
|
|
10.1#
|
Amended
and Restated 1997 Stock Option and Stock Purchase Plan
(filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Form 10 registration statement, as
amended, as filed on March 30, 2001 and incorporated by reference
herein)
|
|
10.1.1#
|
Board
of Directors resolution adopted November 9, 2006
regarding determination of fair market value for stock option grant
purposes (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10.1 filed
herewith)
|
|
10.2+
|
Development
and Supply Agreement, made and entered into as of
January 5, 2000, by and between the Company and Medtronic (filed as
Exhibit 10.4 to our Form 10 registration statement, as amended,
as filed on June 1, 2001 and incorporated by reference
herein)
|
|
10.3+
|
Amendment
No. 1 to Development and Supply Agreement,
effective as of December 22, 2000, by and between the Company and
Medtronic (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to our Form 10 registration
statement, as amended, as filed on June 1, 2001 and incorporated by
reference herein)
|
|
10.4+
|
License
Agreement, effective as of October 8, 2002, by and
between the Company and Medtronic PS Medical, Inc. (filed as
Exhibit 2.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K which was filed on
October 23, 2002 and incorporated by reference herein)
|
|
10.5+
|
Amendment
No. 2 to Development and Supply Agreement,
effective as of September 30, 2002, by and between the Company
and
Medtronic, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 2.4 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K which was filed on October 23, 2002 and incorporated by
reference herein)
|
|
10.7
|
Amended
Master Security Agreement between the Company and
General Electric Corporation, September, 2003 (filed as Exhibit 10.1
to our Form 10-Q Quarterly Report, as filed on November 12, 2003 and
incorporated by reference herein)
|
|
10.8#
|
Asset
Purchase Agreement dated May 7, 2004 between Cytori
Therapeutics, Inc. and MAST Biosurgery AG (filed as Exhibit 2.1
to our
Form 8-K Current Report, as filed on May 28, 2004 and incorporated
by
reference herein.)
|
|
10.8.1
|
Settlement
Agreement dated August 9, 2005, between MAST
Biosurgery AG, MAST Biosurgery, Inc. and the Company (filed as
Exhibit
10.26 to our Form 10-Q, which was filed on November 14, 2005 and
incorporated by reference herein)
|
|
10.9#
|
Offer
Letter for the Position of Chief Financial Officer dated
June 2, 2004 between the Company and Mark Saad (filed as
Exhibit 10.18 to our Form 10-Q Quarterly Report, as filed on
August 16, 2004 and incorporated by reference herein)
|
|
10.10#
|
2004
Equity Incentive Plan of Cytori Therapeutics, Inc. (filed
as Exhibit 10.1 to our Form 8-K Current Report, as filed on
August 27, 2004 and incorporated by reference herein)
|
|
10.10.1#
|
Board
of Directors resolution adopted November 9, 2006
regarding determination of fair market value for stock option grant
purposes (filed herewith)
|
|
10.11
|
Exclusive
Distribution Agreement, effective July 16, 2004 by
and between the Company and Senko Medical Trading Co. (filed as
Exhibit 10.25 to our Form 10-Q Quarterly Report, as filed on
November 15, 2004 and incorporated by reference herein)
|
|
10.12#
|
Notice
and Agreement for Stock Options Grant Pursuant to Cytori
Therapeutics, Inc. 1997 Stock Option and Stock Purchase Plan;
(Nonstatutory) (filed as Exhibit 10.19 to our Form 10-Q
Quarterly Report, as filed on November 15, 2004 and incorporated
by
reference herein)
|
|
10.13#
|
Notice
and Agreement for Stock Options Grant Pursuant to Cytori
Therapeutics, Inc. 1997 Stock Option and Stock Purchase Plan;
(Nonstatutory) with Cliff (filed as Exhibit 10.20 to our
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report, as filed on November 15, 2004 and
incorporated by reference herein)
|
|
10.14#
|
Notice
and Agreement for Stock Options Grant Pursuant to Cytori
Therapeutics, Inc. 1997 Stock Option and Stock Purchase Plan; (Incentive)
(filed as Exhibit 10.21 to our Form 10-Q Quarterly Report, as
filed on November 15, 2004 and incorporated by reference
herein)
|
|
10.15#
|
Notice
and Agreement for Stock Options Grant Pursuant to Cytori
Therapeutics, Inc. 1997 Stock Option and Stock Purchase Plan; (Incentive)
with Cliff (filed as Exhibit 10.22 to our Form 10-Q Quarterly
Report, as filed on November 15, 2004 and incorporated by reference
herein)
|
|
10.16#
|
Form
of Options Exercise and Stock Purchase Agreement Relating
to the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.23 to our
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report, as filed on November 15, 2004 and
incorporated by reference herein)
|
|
10.17#
|
Form
of Notice of Stock Options Grant Relating to the 2004
Equity Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.24 to our Form 10-Q
Quarterly Report, as filed on November 15, 2004 and incorporated
by
reference herein)
|
|
10.18#
|
Separation
Agreement and General Release dated July 15, 2005,
between John K. Fraser and the Company (filed as Exhibit 10.25
to our Form
10-Q Quarterly Report as filed on November 14, 2005 and incorporated
by
reference herein)
|
|
10.19#
|
Consulting
Agreement dated July 15, 2005, between John K.
Fraser and the Company (filed as Exhibit 10.28 to our Form 10-Q
Quarterly
Report as filed on November 14, 2005 and incorporated by reference
herein)
|
|
10.20
|
Agreement
Between Owner and Contractor dated October 10, 2005,
between Rudolph and Sletten, Inc. and the Company (filed as Exhibit
10.20
to our Form 10-K Annual Report as filed on March 30, 2006 and incorporated
by reference herein)
|
|
10.21#
|
Severance
Agreement and General Release dated August 10, 2005,
between Sharon V. Schulzki and the Company (filed as Exhibit 10.27
to our
Form 10-Q Quarterly report as filed on November 14, 2005 and incorporated
by reference herein)
|
|
10.22
|
Common
Stock Purchase Agreement dated April 28, 2005, between
Olympus Corporation and the Company (filed as Exhibit 10.21 to
our Form
10-Q Quarterly Report as filed on August 15, 2005 and incorporated
by
reference herein)
|
|
10.23
|
Sublease
Agreement dated May 24, 2005, between Biogen Idec,
Inc. and the Company (filed as Exhibit 10.21 to our Form 10-Q Quarterly
Report as filed on August 15, 2005 and incorporated by reference
herein)
|
|
10.24#
|
Employment
Offer Letter to Doug Arm, Vice President of
Development—Biologics, dated February 1, 2005 (filed as Exhibit 10.21 to
our Form 10-Q Quarterly Report as filed on August 15, 2005 and
incorporated by reference herein)
|
|
10.25#
|
Employment
Offer Letter to Alex Milstein, Vice-President of
Clinical Research, dated May 1, 2005 (filed as Exhibit 10.21 to
our Form
10-Q Quarterly Report as filed on August 15, 2005 and incorporated
by
reference herein)
|
|
10.26#
|
Employment
Offer Letter to John Ransom, Vice-President of
Research, dated November 15, 2005 (filed as Exhibit 10.26 to our
Form 10-K
Annual Report as filed on March 30, 2006 and incorporated by reference
herein)
|
|
10.27+
|
Joint
Venture Agreement dated November 4, 2005, between Olympus
Corporation and the Company (filed as Exhibit 10.27 to our Form
10-K
Annual Report as filed on March 30, 2006 and incorporated by reference
herein)
|
|
10.28+
|
License/
Commercial Agreement dated November 4, 2005, between
Olympus-Cytori, Inc. and the Company (filed as Exhibit 10.28 to
our Form
10-K Annual Report as filed on March 30, 2006 and incorporated
by
reference herein)
|
|
10.29+
|
License/
Joint Development Agreement dated November 4, 2005,
between Olympus Corporation, Olympus-Cytori, Inc. and the Company
(filed
as Exhibit 10.29 to our Form 10-K Annual Report as filed on March
30, 2006
and incorporated by reference herein)
|
|
10.30+
|
Shareholders
Agreement dated November 4, 2005, between Olympus
Corporation and the Company (filed as Exhibit 10.30 to our Form
10-K
Annual Report as filed on March 30, 2006 and incorporated by reference
herein)
|
|
10.31+
|
Exclusive
Negotiation Agreement with Olympus Corporation, dated
February 22, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.31 to our Form 10-Q Quarterly
Report as filed on May 15, 2006 and incorporated by reference
herein)
|
|
10.32
|
Common
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated August 9, 2006, by and
between Cytori Therapeutics, Inc. and Olympus Corporation (filed
as
Exhibit 10.32 to our Form 8-K Current Report as filed on August
15, 2006
and incorporated by reference herein)
|
|
10.33
|
Form
of Common Stock Subscription Agreement, dated August 9,
2006 (Agreements on this form were signed by Cytori and each of
respective
investors in the Institutional Offering) (filed as Exhibit 10.33
to our
Form 8-K Current Report as filed on August 15, 2006 and incorporated
by
reference herein)
|
|
10.34
|
Placement
Agency Agreement, dated August 9, 2006, between
Cytori Therapeutics, Inc. and Piper Jaffray & Co. (filed as Exhibit
10.34 to our Form 8-K Current Report as filed on August 15, 2006
and
incorporated by reference herein)
|
|
10.35#
|
Stock
Option Extension Agreement between Bruce A. Reuter and
Cytori Therapeutics, Inc. effective July 25, 2006 (filed as Exhibit
10.35
to our Form 10-Q Quarterly Report as filed on November 145, 2006
and
incorporated by reference herein)
|
|
10.36#
|
Stock
Option Extension Agreement between Elizabeth A.
Scarbrough and Cytori Therapeutics, Inc. effective July 25, 2006
(filed as
Exhibit 10.36 to our Form 10-Q Quarterly Report as filed on November
14,
2006 and incorporated by reference herein)
|
|
10.37#
|
Employment
Agreement between Bruce A. Reuter and Cytori
Therapeutics, Inc. effective July 25, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.37
to our
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report as filed on November 14, 2006 and incorporated
by reference herein)
|
|
10.38#
|
Employment
Agreement between Elizabeth A. Scarbrough and Cytori
Therapeutics, Inc. effective July 25, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.38
to our
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report as filed on November 14, 2006 and incorporated
by reference herein)
|
|
10.39+
|
Exclusive
License Agreement between us and the Regents of the
University of California dated October 16, 2001 (filed as Exhibit
10.10 to
our Form 10-K Annual Report as filed on March 31, 2003 and incorporated
by
reference herein)
|
|
10.39.1
+
|
Amended
and Restated Exclusive License Agreement, effective
September 26, 2006, by and between The Regents of the University
of
California and Cytori Therapeutics, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.39
to our
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report as filed on November 14, 2006 and incorporated
by reference herein)
|
|
10.40#
|
Stock
Option Extension Agreement between Charles Galetto and
Cytori Therapeutics, Inc. signed on May 24, 2006 and effective
as of June
1, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.20 to our Form 10-Q Quarterly Report
as filed
on August 14, 2006 and incorporated by reference herein)
|
|
10.41#
|
Part-time
Employment Agreement between Charles Galetto and
Cytori Therapeutics, Inc. signed on May 24, 2006 and effective
as of June
1, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.21 to our Form 10-Q Quarterly Report
as filed
on August 14, 2006 and incorporated by reference herein)
|
|
10.42 | Placement Agency Agreement, dated February 23, 2007, between Cytori Therapeutics, Inc. and Piper Jaffray & Co. (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Form 8-K Current Report as filed on February 26, 2007 and incorporated by reference herein). | |
14.1
|
Code
of Ethics (filed as Exhibit 14.1 to our Annual Report
on Form 10-K which was filed on March 30, 2004 and incorporated by
reference herein)
|
|
23.1
|
Consent
of KPMG LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm (filed herewith).
|
|
31.1
|
Certification
of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to
Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to
Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to
Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to
Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
|
|
32.1
|
Certifications
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350/ Securities
Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b), as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the
Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002 (filed
herewith).
|
CYTORI
THERAPEUTICS, INC.
|
||
By:
|
/s/
Christopher J. Calhoun
|
|
Christopher
J. Calhoun
|
||
Chief
Executive Officer
|
||
March
30, 2007
|
SIGNATURE
|
TITLE
|
DATE
|
||
/s/
Marshall G. Cox
|
Chairman
of the Board of Directors
|
March
30, 2007
|
||
Marshall
G. Cox
|
||||
/s/
Christopher J. Calhoun
|
Chief
Executive Officer, Director (Principal Executive
Officer)
|
March
30, 2007
|
||
Christopher
J. Calhoun
|
||||
/s/
Marc H. Hedrick, MD
|
President,
Director
|
March
30, 2007
|
||
Marc
H. Hedrick, MD
|
||||
/s/
Mark E. Saad
|
Chief
Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
|
March
30, 2007
|
||
Mark
E. Saad
|
||||
/s/
John W. Townsend
|
Chief
Accounting Officer
|
March
30, 2007
|
||
John
W. Townsend
|
||||
/s/
David M. Rickey
|
Director
|
March
30, 2007
|
||
David
M. Rickey
|
||||
/s/
Ronald D. Henriksen
|
Director
|
March
30, 2007
|
||
Ronald
D. Henriksen
|
||||
/s/
E. Carmack Holmes, MD
|
Director
|
March
30, 2007
|
||
E.
Carmack Holmes, MD
|
||||
/s/
Paul W. Hawran
|
Director
|
March
30, 2007
|
||
Paul
W. Hawran
|
/s/
KPMG
|
|
San
Diego, California
|
|
March
30, 2007
|
/s/
KPMG LLP
|
|
San
Diego, California
|
|
March
30, 2007
|
Date:
March 30, 2007
|
|
/s/
Mark E. Saad
|
|
Mark
E. Saad,
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
By:
|
/s/
Christopher J. Calhoun
|
|
Dated:
March 30, 2007
|
Christopher
J. Calhoun
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer
|
||
By:
|
/s/
Mark E. Saad
|
|
Dated:
March 30, 2007
|
Mark
E. Saad
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|